It's not censorship guys calm down.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz I love it when free speech platforms restrict pictures of certain legal anime porn as well. Of course, feel free to post that footage from your favorite call of duty game where you're mowing down an airport of civilians. Can't have anime porn. No sir.

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Lolicon/Shotacon/pedo art in general should be banned.

@A5M0VN0kS1ZmTePTGK.Vivernu@springbo.cc @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz lolicon is based and anti-pedo poasters have been infested by jewish subversion meant to reduce fertility among goyim races by delaying reproduction until past the age of primacy

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @A5M0VN0kS1ZmTePTGK.Vivernu@springbo.cc @sjw@neckbeard.xyz I don't recall contacting the based department, but i'm glad you're here.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz to be fair are you really missing anything of value from "kill all men: the fedi instance"?

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz Someone doesn't understand basic dictionary words and I'm not surprised.

@A5M0VN0kS1ZmTePTGK.Vivernu@springbo.cc @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @A5M0VN0kS1ZmTePTGK.Vivernu@springbo.cc

@denza252@shitposter.club That's not the point

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Guilty as charged.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz it was a joke

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Freedom of curation is too a form of freedom of speech. You can't force people to find anime porn not disgusting.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz Interesting how their kinds of folks always dismiss censorship they're doing with some form of "We're/I'm not the government".

@denza252@shitposter.club @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Here's how I see it: Places like spinster and gab will automatically remove themselves from the conversation without any input from anybody. When people who believe in "freedom" in speech and software proactively block these places it shows they don't even believe that the problem will solve itself. They're scared about something that doesn't exist. And assuming that google never asked tusky to ban gab and spinster it can only be assumed that tusky has something problematic with it. Because surely google would never drop tusky after they took the effort to remove the problematic elements. And it can't be an accident that tusky got removed from an automatic filter because google accepts all sorts of trash on their store. So someone at google may have thought that tusky was alt-right software and removed it. Why would they think that? Curious!

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz fediverse app where at first install in terms of service you have to speak "i hate niggers" into voice recognition to agree with the terms or the app uninstalls itself

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Once you start curating like that you endorse everything said because if you didn't remove it.

@seanking@traboone.com The fuck do they think censorship means?

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz That's a pretty easy hack. I'll bombard your instance with gore and see what happens. You won't be able to censor it because otherwise you become the author of all the rest of the posts.

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Just be sure to mark it as sensitive that's all I ask.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @mystik@midnightride.rs I remember how Andrew Torba was all about free speech until the people who made his platform grow were no longer necessary just to survive. Then he started banning porn to satisfy his Christian sensibilities. Used people and then threw 'em away, all while claiming to be the ethical solution to Twitter. Sounds familiar to me...

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @mystik@midnightride.rs And then give me an option to remove that shit. If I see someone post shit I don't like, I'd rather just block them myself rather than be told a thing is sensitive.

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz thatś why I mentioned being transparent as something very important.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz These people don't actually believe this trash as a principle or else they'd be supporting pic related

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Joining an instance that actively blocks all the stuff you don't like is the most practical way. You're free to do it, and the instance is free to offer you that possibility.

Blatantly stolen from @RacistReimu@poa.st

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz Either they think censorship is only something a government is capable of, they're hungry to control others and will change definitions of words that can be used to call them out so that they can't be defined by that word, or they're just incredibly naive and don't truly understand the concept of what they're building, which is a client for fediverse-compatible instances.

@Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz @mystik@midnightride.rs Marketing it as sensitive AKA NSFW is kind of a necessary evil because we live in a society that frowns on porn at work or other public spaces. It's kind of a balancing act between letting it be allowed and also giving people the ability to open fedi at work, on a library computer, etc. Don't blame me. We live in a society.

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Is it? What if my views change or the views of the admin change? What am I supposed to do?

@jawsh@fedi.jmizzle.com Nope. Essentially since you can run your own F-Droid repo.

@denza252@shitposter.club fuck off. I like the spinsters. And they're "kill all men feminists" insofar as the people who are globalist skeptic are "Nazis." @sjw@neckbeard.xyz

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Some people don't like their timelines full of pictures that they can't see. The option to disable that exists for that reason. But hence inflammatory content comes into play and ruins it all again. That's why we often hear from users "don't go to the fediverse timeline." They are alone at their homes, they want to see everything without having to tap on any hidden picture, but at the same time they don't want to see inflammatory content. They are free to choose a curated instance.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz Migrate.

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz >That's why we often hear from users "don't go to the fediverse timeline." >They are alone at their homes, they want to see everything without having to tap on any hidden picture, but at the same time they don't want to see inflammatory content. Man, you have some gay users.

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz How would I go about doing that exactly?

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz I've received automated messages from user accounts saying "this account has migrated to this other instance." Not sure if it's a Mastodon feature or what. I couldn't find anything like that on my Pleroma.

@PonyPanda@freespeechextremist.com @denza252@shitposter.club @sjw@neckbeard.xyz

@PonyPanda@freespeechextremist.com @sjw@neckbeard.xyz you can own the trannies epic style or whatever it is without sucking up to the literal kill all men feminists

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz That just makes me think of the Bible verse "...But as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD. -Joshua 24:15 Open source developers who are following an ideology about who is not allowed to use their software (at least not easily) are forming their own religion; a religion that cancelled our Lord and Saviour Richard M Stallman.

@denza252@shitposter.club @PonyPanda@freespeechextremist.com @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Yeah just come out as Super Straight like I did. Anyone who attacks you over your newfound sexuality is just a Super Bigot whose deep-seeded Superphobia prevents them from recognizing the struggles you've dealt with as a member of a marginalized community.

@denza252@shitposter.club cope, seethe, have sex, incel. @sjw@neckbeard.xyz

@PonyPanda@freespeechextremist.com @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Who's coping here? I already said that I suppose they shouldn't be blacklisted from that app or whatever. Again why do you like literal kill all men types? Are you one of the "good ones"?

@denza252@shitposter.club because I think we should kill all men and the world should be ruled by women. @sjw@neckbeard.xyz

@mystik@midnightride.rs @Kambeii@neckbeard.xyz That only moves your followers to your new account, not your posts.

@djsumdog@djsumdog.com

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz there can not be censorship in free software, at best its encouragement of the authors to not use that instance stop whining about it already, none of you is even using tusky

@fence@xyzzy.link >there can not be censorship in free software

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz @djsumdog@djsumdog.com lmao I think I listened to this like 3 times looking at something else before I realized it was looping and he wasn't just repeating himself.

sjw - https://neckbeard.xyz/users/sjwThe app user, not the poster on spinster.xyz, is Tusky's customer.This is absolutely tantamount to censorship, not to mention the arrogance and condescension involved, because Tusky's author is forcing his morality on the user.It's a great shame and not a little ironic that so many people in the Fediverse are intent on reintroducing the problems that decentralisation fixes.

@Hartmann@poa.st kings giving credit to other kings. Love to see it. ♕_(︶ω︶*) @RacistReimu@poa.st

@zemichi@neckbeard.xyz @denza252@shitposter.club @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Places that have a problem with others don't remove themselves from the conversation on the Fediverse. When an instance A blocks another instance B, A can't see any messages from B but B can see all messages from A. It is a fundamentally unequal exchange. They get to influence us but we cannot influence them.

@Hyolobrika@counter.fedi.live @denza252@shitposter.club @sjw@neckbeard.xyz >They get to influence us but we cannot influence them. 99% of the time you are not talking and reading messages from people you've known to block you. I've seen less than 5 messages from mastodon social even though I follow people on instances that can interact with them. You're not getting influenced by them.

@Fyrebrand@paypig.org @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Hilary Clinton quote.

@sjw@neckbeard.xyz can they at least write a coherent fucking sentence.

[email protected] >Important