Public
Federated
User

billiam :4chan: @billiam@shitposter.club
Following
0
Followers
0
Posts
16
Imported by PSI
Statuses
Following
Followers
Media
Gallery
Favorites

billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @moth_ball@shitposter.club
@moth_ball@shitposter.club Thanks, I'll give it a try. I guess custard would also be a good accompaniment.

billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @moth_ball@shitposter.club
@moth_ball@shitposter.club Did you make it? Is it easy to make? Would you say that it's worth trying?


billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @TrevorGoodchild@freespeechextremist.com
@TrevorGoodchild@freespeechextremist.com @judgedread@freespeechextremist.com it also makes for a good rhetoric regarding covid. I.e. look at how they bent over backwards for faggots to be unhindered in spreading aids vs the draconian measures which they make us live under for a far less serious disease.

billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @judgedread@freespeechextremist.com
@judgedread@freespeechextremist.com @TrevorGoodchild@freespeechextremist.com @chj0@udongein.xyz @georgia@netzsphaere.xyz
I highly advise reading this thread: https://salo-forum.com/index.php?threads/patient-zero-and-the-early-days-of-hiv-aids.3167/
Also, this book might interest you: http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=The%20Health%20Hazards%20of%20Homosexuality&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def


billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @judgedread@freespeechextremist.com
@judgedread@freespeechextremist.com @georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @TrevorGoodchild@freespeechextremist.com @chj0@udongein.xyz twin studies disprove the idea that homosexuality is genetic.
In studies with a large n, if one identical twin is a homosexual the other will be homosexual only ~20% of the time (Australian study) to ~8% (Swedish study)
This is unlike physical characteristics where the identical twins will be... well pretty much identical.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-008-9386-1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10743878/
Genetic and Environmental Effects on Same-sex Sexual Behavior: A Population Study of Twins in Sweden - Archives of Sexual Behavior
There is still uncertainty about the relative importance of genes and environments on human sexual orientation. One reason is that previous studies employed self-selected, opportunistic, or small population-based samples. We used data from a truly population-based 2005–2006 survey of all adult twins (20–47 years) in Sweden to conduct the largest twin study of same-sex sexual behavior attempted so far. We performed biometric modeling with data on any and total number of lifetime same-sex sexual partners, respectively. The analyses were conducted separately by sex. Twin resemblance was moderate for the 3,826 studied monozygotic and dizygotic same-sex twin pairs. Biometric modeling revealed that, in men, genetic effects explained .34–.39 of the variance, the shared environment .00, and the individual-specific environment .61–.66 of the variance. Corresponding estimates among women were .18–.19 for genetic factors, .16–.17 for shared environmental, and 64–.66 for unique environmental factors. Although wide confidence intervals suggest cautious interpretation, the results are consistent with moderate, primarily genetic, familial effects, and moderate to large effects of the nonshared environment (social and biological) on same-sex sexual behavior.


billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @Bertpro2000@poa.st
@Bertpro2000@poa.st you can still have fun, post memes, engage in discussions
@asa891@shitposter.club sure, and even if normies come this will still be better than twitter, but I am content with how things are now and I have seen how the influx of people lowered the quality of 4chan

billiam :4chan:
@asa891@shitposter.club idk if that's a good thing: normie dilution could hurt this platform. Content and interaction is a lot better on here that on twitter, albeit the volume of content is less.

billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @lain_os@yggdrasil.social
@lain_os@yggdrasil.social @Immahnoob@varishangout.net @Meemoo@poa.st @A5M0VN0kS1ZmTePTGK.Vivernu@springbo.cc @kino@springbo.cc
Thanks - good sources.
It makes sense from an r-k selection perspective.
r-types are going to be attracted to younger females (they want to have as many children as quickly as possible) and they aren't going to value intelligence as much (as that is a long run, k-type strategy)



billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @moth_ball@shitposter.club
@moth_ball@shitposter.club they aren't that self-conscious - you're projecting your way of thinking onto them

billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @mangeurdenuage@shitposter.club
@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.club @kaia@shitposter.club ahh dysgenics



billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @kaia@shitposter.club
@kaia@shitposter.club Sure, I'm a billionaire (in Zim dollars) 


billiam :4chan:
replyReply to @kaia@shitposter.club
@kaia@shitposter.club might as well just get pregnant now