𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
I am going to engage in a little White Shaming this morning. I think it is merited. How many of you are genuinely able to name more than one piece of classical music that isn't hammered to death by Hollywood? How many of you can name a composer other than Mozart or Beethoven, AND THEN, name a piece of music associated with that composer? How many of you have read Kipling, or Robert Service, or Thomas Mallory? Can you name the Greek, Roman, or Norse gods, beyond the ones mocked by the Jews at Marvel Comics? In what year did the German people slaughter three whole Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest? Far too many of you can name and sing along to every nigger rap song out there, and know every Jap anime that has ever existed (except Appleseed; nobody seems to know Appleseed), and have seen every jew-made Hollywood blockbuster out there. But almost none of you know Allegri. I put a geas upon you. But you probably don't know what a geas is, do you. geas (plural geasa or geases) pron. "Ges". (originally in ancient Irish religion and mythology) A vow, obligation or injunction placed upon someone to do something, which typically brings harm if violated and blessings if obeyed. Do one thing today, to enrich your understanding of White Culture and improve your knowledge of your own people.
Largo
Reply to @[email protected]
Homework Task: Read about Sulla, Crassus, Pompey, and Caesar. This should cover The Social War, The Spartacus Uprising, Sulla & Marius' Civil War, Caesar's Conquest of Gaul, Crassus' Parthian War, and eventually Caesar crossing the Rubicon. Many lessons to be learned from reading about the last 40 years of the Roman Republic.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
I really need to read Crassus and Pompey. There's some Scipio I need to pay attention to as well. So many Romans. So little time. Currently working on Plutarch. Last year I read Caesar, Ovid, and Plato's "Republic". Took me five months to properly read that last one... Half the stupid shit in the White Western world would not have happened if we had just read Ovid and Plato. It is all forewarned in there.
dogslurp, 🤰🏻🐕 "pregnant Anne Frank"
Reply to @[email protected]
Imagine how many great books didn't get copied. Well, in some cases you don't have to imagine. But still, imagine! I'm reading Fall of Rome by Bryan Ward-Perkins. So far it's covering pottery and roof tiles. Not sure what else it'll cover. But Rome definitely fell and there was much of value that was lost for hundreds of years. And unlike technology, there's no mechanism for rediscovering the deeds or thoughts of men. Preserve it, motherfuckers!
AlyoCat
Reply to @[email protected]
Saint Patrick not only invented green piss beer, he brought Christianity to Ireland, he instilled a sense of literacy and learning that would create the conditions that allowed Ireland to become "the isle of saints and scholars"... thus preserving Western culture while Europe was being overrun by barbarians. While Europe evolved from the classical age of Rome to the medieval era, it could not have been a thing without Ireland. Irish monks and scribes maintained the very record of Western civilization... copying manuscripts of Greek and Latin writers, both pagan and Christian, while libraries and learning on the continent were forever lost. ☘️
EdBoatConnoisseur
Reply to @[email protected]
that is without mentioning the differences in higiene from an irishman and an englishman, when the norsemen arrived to conquer england the englishmen feared their women would flee from them to norsemen as the norsemen custom of washing their whole body at least once a week was not a standar of cleanliness that englishmen could compete with, writings from the time claim english women could tell when their men went outside the village from the smell alone.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
Is this documented, or just standard academic hatred for White cultures? Because, the Dark Ages is all bullshit too.
Suquili 🦎
Reply to @[email protected]
Who gives a fuck. Autism over classical music isn’t gonna win the culture war. Your white skin is enough, be proud of it.
The dark ages were caused by the churches making possession of a Bible a capital crime.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
There was never a Dark Ages, Bob. Thats an academic trope.
Are you denying people were martyred?
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
Are you pivoting and asking leading questions? One thing is not the other, and Martyrs date back to the time of Christ Himself.
Possession of a Bible. Translation of Bibles. These became capital crimes. Did it happen?
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
You are arguing causation. I have never seen anything to indicate that the events you name actually caused a period that has been proven to be just academic hatred of European culture. See: The Irish monks of the period after the fall of the Roman Empire, circa 500 AD.
Why are you dancing?
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
I am not. You are attributing the so-called Dark Ages to the criminalization of private possession of a Bible, which is silliness. That's false causation, and doesn't even make any sense.
How could the abscence of the Word of God be crucial? You certainly haven't read 1st and 2nd Chronicles. Snidely_Whiplash
☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
Dude, surely you jest. Widespread literacy tends to be the exception in history, not the norm. Books / scrolls were expensive, no doubt. But “trained professionals” whose business it was to read these documents usually didn’t go without.
That's got nothing to do with access to the Gospel.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
Then by your own words, there is no way that access (or lack thereof) could CAUSE the Dark Ages. The era of the so-called "Dark Ages" is simply the end of the age of the Bronze and Iron Age empires, like Greece, Persia, Rome, etc. It was just a shift in how politics were implemented.
Withholding the Bible was the dark age. You can quote me.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
You are both illiterate ignorant and stupid. The bible was read aloud in every church in Chistendom every fucking day, by the only people available who could read. They made sure to cycle through the sections of the bible so the entire NT and most of the old would be read every year.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
"The bible was read aloud in every church in Chistendom every fucking day" -- this is exactly what I am saying though. You are 110% correct. What I am saying is that the average person did not own a book at all, let alone a home Bible. That wasn't a thing until the 16th century.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
If he had it would have done him no good. About 4% of the population could read. Charlemagne made some stir by learning to read after he became Emperor.
People hear. People read. If they have the Gospel.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
Most people couldn't read until around the early 19th Century, Bob. Now what.
Special Guest Star
Reply to @[email protected]
disagree. there was usually one person in each home who could read, even among the poorest people. there wasn’t much TO read, but someone needed to be able to read the Bible aloud to the family. that said, iconography and ecclesiastical interpretation was still very important
WilhelmIII
Reply to @[email protected]
Until the printing press, only the church had religious books. Only the very wealthy had any other kind of book. After the printing press, what you describe is accurate until modern times.
The printing press was the churches problem. People had to be killed lest the Word escape to the public.
WilhelmIII
Reply to @[email protected]
Before the printing press, the Church was the center of village life. Most people in Europe attended a formal mass two or three times a week, and the Church also served as the social center for the community. Larger churches would also have an attached monastery or abbey. Senior management in Rome was highly political and corrupt, but the local churches were dedicated to spreading the Word of God.
No. They were dedicated to withholding the Gospel. Religion is a for profit enterprise. Grace is the Gift of God. Jesus paid for your Gift with His Precious Blood. There's no gold or real estate in that kind of transaction. He died for you personally. Your sins past, present and future, big or small were dealt with at the Cross. But you have to believe in what He did, not what you do.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
"No. They were dedicated to withholding the Gospel." Show any evidence of this.
I told you. Martyrs. You denied them.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
You keep saying that. I denied exactly nothing. You have yet to prove that martyrs only existed during the Dark Ages. They have even existed in modern times. Your point on martyrs is moot, at best.
Don't believe me. Look for yourself. The church killed people for having a Bible. It's a problem for them then and now. On a scroll, on your phone, written by airplane ... I'm telling you the Gospel. How much have I been paid? Where's my art collection?
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
"The church killed people for having a Bible." I need an example of this. I read a lot of history, Bob. Especially from that period. Give me an example.
You don't believe me. I can't make you. If I give you a source, you won't believe that. Do your own research. It's not hard. Try.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
cop out. Give me a source. You can do it.
No.
notabnormal
Reply to @[email protected]
Like 9 people want you to produce a source, Bobber
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
See, you've fucked up. Because now you've pissed me off. These are the only references to what you're talking about. "At the provincial Second Council of Tarragona (Conventus Tarraconensis) in 1234, the Spanish bishops, according to a decree of King James I of Aragon, declared that it was forbidden to anyone, to own a Romance language translation of books of the Old and New Testament." "in 1229 at the Council of Toulouse, the Catholic Church actually made it illegal for anyone other than the clergy to own a copy of the Old or New Testament, otherwise, he must be executed." None of this is Dark Ages.
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
He fucked up, because I'm that guy. I'll go do the research. All the incidents he is talking about are from the 13th Century. Zero examples prior to the 11th Century.
You have ears, right? You know how they work without eyes ... The alphabet predates the printing press ...
𝔅𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔩𝔢 𝔇𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔣 𝔊𝔦𝔪𝔩𝔦
Reply to @[email protected]
"You have ears, right? The alphabet predates the printing press..." um... Ears... Alphabet... Wut?
The Gospel was withheld by the churches. I don't care if it was printed.
Count Ferdinand Adolf Heinrich August Graf Von Zeppelin
Reply to @[email protected]
quick read of this wikipedia page, seems like any bans are related to translations, not having copies of the vulgate. with exception of a few local councils, but that does not all of rome make wikipedia dot org/wiki/Censorship_of_the_Bible
WilhelmIII
Reply to @[email protected]
The problem then, as now, is trying to make sure that the people aren't being misled by bad translations. In hindsight, considering the damage the Scofield Bible has done, they had a point.
This is in Schofield Bible word for word. [1Co 15:1-4 KJV] 1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
WilhelmIII
Reply to @[email protected]
The Scofield "bible" is jewed. "Central to Christian Zionist belief is Scofield’s commentary (italicized below) on Genesis 12
“‘I will bless them that bless thee.’ In fulfillment closely related to the next clause, ‘And curse him that curseth thee.’ Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.” Drawing on Scofield’s rather tendentious interpretation, Hagee claims, “The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.” "
The Schofield Bible is a King James translation verse for verse.
WilhelmIII
Reply to @[email protected]
Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed. Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
It is the law, of most ancient and venerable custom, going back to the Apostles, that no Catholic religious service of any kind can be held at which the Gospel is not read aloud to the congregation. This is what Bob calls "Withholding the Gospel." What was banned were bad and heretical translations and commentaries, of the sort you seem to be most admiring of..
Can we agree that there is only one Gospel? Would you please proclaim that Gospel that you've heard so many, many times? [Gal 1:6-10 KJV] 6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
I proclaim it all the time, Bob. You refuse to proclaim it. The Gospel is summarized in the Creed, which you despise.
Let me see the words ...
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
I believe in God, the Father, Almighty, creator of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, His Son, Our Lord, who was conceived of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary, who suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried, descended into hell, rose again from the dead on the third day, ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of God the Father almighty, who will come again to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, and life everlasting.
Great. That's not the Gospel. This is the Gospel. [1Co 15:1-4 KJV] 1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
Can you articulate precisely where the Symbol of Faith falls short ?
Eve was instructed to not eat the fruit. (Faith) Eve told Satan that they were not to eat the fruit or touch it. (Works)
Semilexic
Reply to @[email protected]
This is what we are talking about. The faith/works distinction is because of a mistranslation by Luther. When he was asked why he mistranslated, he said it was on purpose because he felt it should be that way. The problem with "faith alone" is that you can't point at a pastors 1000sqft mansion and ten ferraris and say "brother you are not christian" because the church is falling apart. The pastor can counter with "i have faith, therefore im Christian" and it is an ultimate trump card. **Works are a worldly receipt for faith,** they should be synonymous, only a liar would separate works from faith. Because he does one thing, and claims to believe another, which is called a lie. It is wrong to "side" with Paul or James, they are both part of the Bible, and both Paul and James are in 100% full agreement on faith and works. It is the interpretation that is flawed and *only* the interpretation that is flawed, the Holy Writ is by definition correct.
Festive Pepe
Reply to @[email protected]
I teach a Bible study at a church that wrestles with this. The are prot but run into the logical inconsistency of sola fide. I ask people “would a faithful Christian do (or neglect to do) [blank]”
Your salvation is the accomplishment of Jesus Christ. You are saved by His Grace. It's a Gift. It's not a reward. There are rewards and you can suffer losses. You can't build anything without the Foundation which is Christ. [1Co 3:10-15 KJV] 10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. 11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; 13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. 14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Semilexic
Reply to @[email protected]
>Your salvation is the accomplishment of Jesus Christ. You are saved by His Grace. It's a Gift. It's not a reward Are you being obtuse on purpose? So sin doesnt exist? Nothing you can do to doom yourself because Jesus will save you?
Brokenshakles
Reply to @[email protected]
The whole point of Jesus Christ is that he is God in the form of a Man, and therefore can substitute a Man's mercy for God's constancy in Justice, for with the second we are ALL damned. BUT.... You must still convince a *Man* to forgive you, with all that implies. Men are convinced and convicted by works AND words, not words alone. Even Christ will agree, actions speak louder...
Festive Pepe
Reply to @[email protected]
we all start off as sinners, but through your faith, you should desire sin less and good works more. we are supposed to strive for perfection.
Semilexic
Reply to @[email protected]
He said all sin is permitted because the blood of Jesus wipes out future sin. Hes just a heretic bount for Hell, theres no arguing with this.
No. He went to the Cross because sin wasn't permitted. It had to be dealt with and we can't. He did. [Rom 6:14-15 KJV] 14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. 15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
Festive Pepe
Reply to @[email protected]
do you take the remission of sin from the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ to excuse your sin without further repentance?
The Daily Stormer Digest
Reply to @[email protected]
I am probably going to regret tapping in here, but it feels like we're missing in this thread the difference between venial vs. mortal sins, and the need in either case to fully repent of your sins and ask for God's forgiveness before your salvation can be restored. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/mortal-and-venial-sin Here is the Catechism of the Catholic Church on the difference between the two: [1855] Mortal Sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God’s law; it turns man away from God… by preferring an inferior good to him. Venial sin allows charity to subsist, though it offends and wounds it. [1861] Mortal sin… results in… the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell… [1862] One commits venial sin when, in a less serious matter, he does not observe the standard prescribed by the moral law, or when he disobeys the moral law in a grave matter, but without full knowledge or complete consent. [1863] Venial sin weakens charity… and… merits temporal punishment. Deliberate and unrepented venial sin disposes us little by little to commit mortal sin. However, venial sin does not break the covenant with God. With God’s grace, it is humanly reparable. “Venial sin does not deprive the sinner of sanctifying grace, friendship with God, charity, and consequently, eternal happiness.” tl;dr: Venial sins you can go to confession for, and you'll be fine as long as you sincerely repent. Mortal sins are up to God to judge, even if you sincerely repent. Just from me skimming this thread, it looks as though we are conflating the (correct) idea that our salvation through Christ is our birthright with the idea we can just do whatever want and still be saved. This is not the case. The salvation is our birthright, but we must repent of our venial sins and not commit mortal sins. Anyway. I didn't see these concepts being brought up so I figured I'd introduce them. Carry on. I won't bitch about being kept in the thread or receiving counterarguments. I tapped in, after all.
Show more
Mortal and Venial Sin?
The most common Bible verse used against the very Catholic and very biblical doctrines concerning mortal and venial sin is James 2:10-11: For whoever keeps the...
There is nothing about restoring your salvation. That would make His Gift contingent on our works. There are no venial sins. [Rom 6:23 KJV] 23 For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Bowsac Noodle ☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
The idea makes sense to man, which is why we have it presented to us. The sins we commit are just that — sin. The root question ends up at predestination or not and the way it asks that is whether or not "once saved always saved" is valid, even at extreme examples. Would a baptized believer who, in a fit of rage, kills 5 innocent people be saved? The questions start flowing: was that person actually a Christian, did they believe truly that they were, and did that stop when they chose to kill 5 Innocents? If yes, how about 50 or 500 or 5,000 and is there a number where it stops being "yes" ? The Bibls says we will know them by their fruits, and what if this person was incredibly good to others for every other day in their adult life? Did they choose to reject God through their actions? I tend to think so, but I also think this hypothetical murderer could be redeemed and forgiven. The grace they'd receive would be equally unearned as before their murder spree.
The Daily Stormer Digest
Reply to @[email protected]
At that point, at least according to Catholicism, is it's up to God. But the sinner must repent either way. There is no salvation without repentance, just as is there is no salvation without belief.
☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
One thing that’s great about Traditional Christianity, is you can actually *make specific, meaningful and intelligent statements* about what the Almighty God is *actually* doing with His people - past, present, and by extension and inference, future.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
Especially if you take notice of the Covenant Promises. They amount to an historical and prophetic portrait of the Israelite people.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
They are a covenant with the Church. The Church is Israel. Or, more accurately, the Israelites were a prefigurement of the True Israel, Christ's church.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
And "Israel" is a people, and the Covenant Promises tell you exactly who they are. They aren't the so called "Jews" and they damned sure aren't negroes.
Snidely_Whiplash
Reply to @[email protected]
Israel is the Kingdom, of which Christ is the King. The ethnic tribal kingdom that God granted to the Hebrews is not His Kingdom. It never was and it couldn't be. Read your scripture. Just remember: Hebrews are not Israelites are not Judahites, are not Judeans, are not Jews. Modern day Jews have literally nothing in common with the biblical Kingdom of Israel, except a propensity to demon worship.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
"Modern day jews have literally nothing in common with the biblical Kingdom of Israel... " I know that, and I have read my scripture. Jesus told his disciples to only go to the lost sheep of the House of Israel. And where did they go? The epistles tell you where they went: Romans, Galatians, Colossians, etc. . All European countries.
☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
You guys seem in agreement on the subject; I’ve long held that Biblical Israel *is* Christendom. This is *the* Traditional Christian position on the subject. judeoChristians try to impugn Trad Christians as holding “Replacement Theology”. But that’s a distortion. Christendom did not “replace” Israel. It’s *always been Israel*. The entire time.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
And Christendom is the Western World, a.k.a. Whitey's 'hood.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
I would include Russia and the Eastern bloc countries in "Christendom" if they weren't so shot through with Asiatic admixture. I lived in Asia for a couple of years. No way are they like us. Not at all.
Semilexic
Reply to @[email protected]
>X is not white Picrel are the original Finnish people. The story is similar for central euros, Austrians, Hungarians, Bulgarians, Germans, all have extremely high Hunnic admixture. Hitler didnt get his black straight hair from a scandinavian ancestry, it was from Huns. And then lets not talk about the half-negroid italians and half-moor spaniards, or the persian mix greeks, giving them quinine causes the same bad reaction as giving africans quinine. Btw have you seen the Brits lately? Or their colonies? They all smell like curry, and Amerinoids are mutted to fuck 5ft tall creaturas. Or maybe its jewish to do this divide & conquer shit.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
"And then lets not talk about the half-negroid italians and half-moor spaniards, or the persian mix greeks." Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. "Amerinoids are mutted to fuck 5ft tall creatures." Such nonsense. Most people who say such things have never even set foot in North America. They get everything they think they know about it from movies and TV shows and retarded TikTok vids. Genetic studies prove that 95% of Americans are White only. Imagine that? We're actually Whiter than half the Euroids who call us mutts. Lol. https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/01/white-americans-are-very-white-indeed/
White Americans Are Very White Indeed
A GENETICS ancestry survey published by 23andme some time ago deserves greater publicity than it received in the controlled media. It found that White Americans (European Americans) on average are: “98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent African and 0.18 percent Native American.” Wow, that’s pretty white. I’ll come back to that
☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
I can affirm, from experience through a vast territorial expanse of my home country, a *huge* number, many millions of racially unmixed White Americans. The overwhelming majority of the actual land area is indwelt by Whites. Only in the large cities are we outnumbered. While this certainly isn’t a tolerable arrangement, it’s more understandable why it’s happened. It was treachery and deceit - not some innate defect of our people; unless high-trust is itself “defective”.
Semilexic
Reply to @[email protected]
I estimate whites are around 30-40% of the population in United states. Yet we own a vast majority of actual land.
UnrepentantWhiteDevil
Reply to @[email protected]
I know that the currently touted official figure of around 70% White is a lie, but 30-40% is a bit low-ball, although it certainly looks that way in the Southwest. I think around 55-60% is about right, but dropping fast.
Bowsac Noodle ☦️
Reply to @[email protected]
There's a legit baby boom happening right now in the heartland and Appalachia. People are recognizing the threat and how different and alien the rest of the people here are from us and how they want our way of life destroyed and us dead, so they spend more time with like-minded people who tend to have larger families and baby fever sets in. The more people check out from piss earth globohomo the more back towards normalcy we become and then more kids we have.
🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘
Reply to @[email protected]
The biggest trick they ever played was convincing White people that they have to be "economically secure" before having children.