> half-jewish I’ve heard claims like this, but I don’t know how I’d actually verify it. I did hear the recording of him vehemently denying he was jewish - but it wasn’t technically a statement about his ancestry so I’m still in a state of uncertainty about it.

Yeah I don’t at all doubt something newly emergent from The West’s historical lands; just that it’ll still be The West. A new Caesar will rather be The West’s *heir*.

Hitler was the Final Issue of The West.

YouTube made it hard to find the good comments. Glad dude that made it landed on the correct takeaway.

It’s not the *first* time the Arts have been subverted, but it’s probably the *worst* time.

Oh dear me, a Turk, asserting unflattering opinions about Orthodox Christians ? Who ever heard of such a thing ?

Well, maybe it was treated as such, at one time or another. But Orthodox understand quite well the critical distinction between Veneration, and Worship. In our missionary work, we’ve not ever expected that the newly Baptized abandon their ancestral cultural legacy; but rather that they honor them, by abandoning lies, errors and idolatries.

Of course, I poasted the above comment *before* I found out dude is a literal Turk 😂

Yeah I personally suspect you may have fallen into the trap of zeal-not-according-to-knowledge. What you’re writing off as generic “paganism” is mostly the ancestral cultural inheritance of the Nations. Clearly, some “glorification” and “mythologizing” occurs throughout the long course of millennia; but in all likelihood, it’s referring to actual men in prehistoric times.

There are actually a few shortcomings that I see to the book - but it’s nevertheless priceless in terms of understanding the 20th Century from The West’s perspective.

Yeah I don’t agree with any of that shit - and I certainly don’t recall any mention of it from Imperium. I recommend Imperium, 100%.

Francis Parker Yockey; I’d honestly not heard anything about him being a jew - though it’s widely acknowledged he took Spengler’s idea and corrected it in *Imperium* (highly recommended).

Perhaps influenced by - but having drawn different conclusions; ostensibly due to his being a White Man, far more innately capable of Abstraction, and reasoning from First Principles.

Yeah man; I was *way* more impressed with Yockey.

Not familiar with - Schmitt, eh ? I just kind of know what it is.

Imperialism is perfectly fine, so long as you’re the one doing it.

Consider: the Divine Right of Kings. What would possibly have convinced King James VI & I that he needed to articulate such a position ? What might have afforded such an opportunity ? Well, it might have had something to do with the fact his Royal Authority was automatically and inherently being undermined at all times by the Papacy. Could have been.

It boggles my mind that billions of people can look at the basic reality, and fail to realize that, maybe, religiously justified Imperialism just might not be conducive to preserving National sovereignty.

Thank you for reaching out for clarification. I understand you’re asking whether or not predictive power would be a better term for what I’m describing. In my usage, “predictive power” is a proper subset of “explanatory power”. By explanatory power, I mean specifically the capacity of a given explanation, to make sense of a dataset. The ability of an explanation to accurately predict subsequent outcomes and revelations, is one facet of making sense of it. But it isn’t the only such facet (though it’d be a hard sell to convince most people it isn’t the most useful). Hope that helps; if not, I’m happy to dive deeper.

Do I know this ? Well, basically, yes. Can I prove it ? No. But when it comes to dealing with Uncertainty, I’m a *huge* fan of Explanatory Power. Which possible explanation, of all available reasonable explanations, makes the most sense out of the broadest dataset ? While this doesn’t constitute *proof* in the classical sense of the word, it returns results with very satisfactory probability yields.