Public
Federated
User

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)@[email protected]
Following
23
Followers
33
Posts
33
#fedi22 #FreeSoftware #Programming #ProgrammingLanguages #Scheme #Emacs #Politics #Ethics #Philosophy #Feminism
Statuses
Following
Followers
Media
Gallery
Favorites

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@lab.nyanide.com
> I'm not even considered


Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Kyonko802@varishangout.net @DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net
You haven't criticized someone for supporting such a subculture, you simply called them a "Latino troon." Use your brain.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net @Kyonko802@varishangout.net
I'm quite happy as a male. I guess you are so low in intelligence that you think anyone who points out your stupidity must be part of whatever group of people you currently irrationally hate the most.
A couple years ago you would have called me a nigger or a woman, now it's troon, because that's how your brain works: "I don't like this person, and I hate people of group X, therefore this person must be part of group X." So retarded...

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net @Kyonko802@varishangout.net
No I'm just not interested in putting that much effort into a retarded argument over nothing because I have a life.
(That's a lie I don't have a life but I'd rather play video games than argue about stupid shit right now.)

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net @Kyonko802@varishangout.net
Jesus Christ that's a lot of words. I honestly don't feel like reading all that. It's not that deep man: The guy made a fairly accurate statement about the fact that "gaming on Linux" is by and large a hack, and expressed this with the somewhat hyperbolic statement that "there is not really gaming on Linux as such" and you're losing your mind over it for no reason whatsoever.
Find more important things to get mad about.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@hellhammer666@varishangout.net @DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net @Kyonko802@varishangout.net It's not bait at all, it's simply facts. You should get out of your little troll echo chamber.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Kyonko802@varishangout.net @DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net
Semantics. The man with no argument resorts to insults. Typical.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@DarkMahesvara@varishangout.net @Kyonko802@varishangout.net
1. Semantics
2. Semantics
3. Irrelevant, since many games still need hacks to run well or at all, like he said
4. Irrelevant; if the game doesn't work well on GNU/Linux because it's not been made for GNU/Linux, his point is proven, and the reason is irrelevant
5. Irrelevant, already too much for some normies, and some games need more than that; like he said 5m to 5h
There seems to be nothing fundamentally wrong in what he said, except that GNU/Linux or GNU+Linux might have been a more appropriate term than Linux.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Kyonko802@varishangout.net That doesn't sound inaccurate at all. What I'd call retarded is insulting someone just for being Latino and trans. And I'm saying that as someone who's very critical of the transgender movement and isn't afraid to point out serious issues in the subculture of trans-identified male software nerds.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Morghur@decayable.ink @rosey@catgirl.rehab @RustyCrab@clubcyberia.co
Total Racist Death.
I will come for you in your sleep.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @PurpCat@clubcyberia.co @Hoss@shitpost.cloud
So you're saying it's all a big conspiracy to make the game (AC:S) seem commercially successful? Okie dokie.
It looks like I didn't look closely enough at DA:V though so you're right about that one:
> In January 2025, EA announced that Veilguard had "engaged" 1.5 million players during the three months ending December 31, 2024, underperforming their expectations by nearly half.[113][e] The same month, EA reported a poor performance of EA Sports FC 25 and a 18% loss in share value following their holiday earning reports.[41][115][116]
But if you want to claim that Ubisoft is in financial trouble because of "woke" elements in their games / in AC:S specifically, then you'll need better evidence. I think there's an element of cope in there. I don't think the situation is that simple.
And even for DA:V, it's easy for the pro-woke faction to argue that it was just not executed well. I mean, that dialogue about being non-binary... Holy shit. It was like a parody of a woke video game that an anti-woke person would come up with, and then people would say "come on bro, that parody is way too exaggerated" except it's actually real and not even a parody at all.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@PurpCat@clubcyberia.co @Hoss@shitpost.cloud @coolboymew@shitposter.world
> Ubisoft stated that Assassin's Creed Shadows surpassed a million players on its release date,[80] and had three million players within a week.[81][82] Steam showed a concurrent player count peak of 41,412 on launch day,[80] growing to 64,825 during the first weekend after launch.[82][83] The feat established the game as the highest Assassin's Creed game by concurrent players on Steam to date.[82] Shadows was the best-selling game of March 2025 according to analysis by market research firm Circana,[84][85] and the second-best selling game of the year after Monster Hunter Wilds.[86]
Am I missing something? Looks like the game was a strong commercial success despite the "woke" stuff?
I haven't played it or looked into it much, so I have no opinion on whether the success was deserved or not. I only know that the main characters are a black guy (based on a real person from history) and a woman if I remember correctly, which in and on itself isn't a bad thing; just a question of how well the idea is executed.
For example, if the black protagonist talks like a 21st century US American civil rights activist despite being a 17th century East African dude who ended up in Japan, then that would be quite cringe-worthy and eyeroll-inducing. Likewise, if the female protag started talking like she's a liberal feminist from tumblr while being an 18th century Japanese assassin or something, I couldn't stomach that.
But if the game was such a success then it must have not been that bad... No wait, I just checked the sales of DA:Veilguard and it was also a big commercial success, so never mind, I guess people really buy anything. :blobcat-thonking: Also, I just literally laughed out loudly when I saw that the only award it won was from GLAAD. :blobcat-extremejoy:
In any case, it seems like the higher-ups are likely to ignore the social media complaints / sarcastic memes / etc. about the games, since the money is flowing. They will only react if people actually refuse to buy the game, like it was the case with Concord for example, which was down to a lot more than just "woke stuff" though.
As much as I'm critical of some "woke" things, I think it's often just a cope when people say "go woke go broke." There are some instances where it happens (Bud Light??) but it's not universal, especially not in gaming and other media consumed by youngsters.
Show more

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@hfaust@shitposter.world None, because I'm not into children and I already have an (adult) girlfriend.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@rosey@catgirl.rehab @mikuphile@gearlandia.haus @meso@new.asbestos.cafe
Imagine not using a solid black background on an OLED to save battery.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
@porkcow@shitposter.world @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @coolboymew@shitposter.world @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
I sound fat.
You are fat.


Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
replyReply to @[email protected]
@dick@cawfee.club @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @coolboymew@shitposter.world @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
Thank you for proving that y'all are a bunch of pedos. I bet the mew guy is still in denial.
Get therapy.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @dick@cawfee.club @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
Yeah let's all pretend that SHAFT didn't specifically draw a frame of her crotch when she had the body of a 10 year old, with the vulva covered with nothing but a band-aid.
Shinobu is a character designed to appeal to pedophiles. Anyone denying that is either blind or an idiot. In your case it's clearly the latter.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
I said "IIRC" because I don't remember the details / am not familiar with this Uzuki character or whatever the name is. It's also not the point. Any sexual objectification is bad. Texas can ban all pornography for all I care.
Nobody is "banning anime." If you claim that because there's a law that bans lolicon hentai and things that could be argued to be lolicon hentai, you're straight up admitting that the only anime you care about is lolicon hentai and things that could be argued to be lolicon hentai.
In which case: Opinion discarded.

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
> First, she's in college
Irrelevant. Shinobu is a little child no matter how loud you scream "nooo she's a 9000 year old vampire!"
IIRC the character you're talking about is also intentionally drawn to look like a child.
> > Besides, you don't know how many people may have AVOIDED the blood donation booth
> Second, considering it's Japan, and you don't have to accept the gift either, this line of reasoning is a total cope
You really believe that nobody in Japan is bothered by lolicon stuff? Boy, I have a bridge to sell you.
How is a gift optionally given to people afterwards relevant at all? Did they try to attract people with placards of the character or did they not? (If they did, my point stands; if they didn't, it means people were donating blood anyway and didn't need the gift.)
> The reality is that worthless feminist complaining, which is always crazy and based in lala fantasy land "Oh my god the character is attractive" as usual, had real life consequences in shutting down a blood drive with merch that would have heavily attracted people that probably wouldn't have normally given blood... And you defended it at all cost
"BLAH BLAH BLAH it's literally impossible to have a blood donation booth without a sexualised character looking like a little girl!
BLAH BLAH BLAH"
Cope.
If it was shut down because people were that offended, that PROVES that it was probably driving people away anyway.
Or was it an evil white feminist who suddenly descended from the skies and had it cancelled when all the Japanese people actually liked it? I bet you believe this.
Show more

Taylan (Schizo Feminist Cat)
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @Tsuki@amami.paradigm-x.tokyo @BowsacNoodle@poa.st @SuperSnekFriend@poa.st @lykanthrocide@shitposter.world @noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
No, you retard. I questioned the necessity to use sexual objectification (of underage looking female characters, IIRC) to incentivize people to donate blood.
If people NEED to be shown some big titty anime girl (who otherwise looks like a little girl) to be motivated to donate blood, because NOTHING ELSE can motivate them, then society is fucked.
Besides, you don't know how many people may have AVOIDED the blood donation booth because they glanced at it and saw something perverse. If objectification can make people decide to donate blood, it can also make them avoid donating blood.
Either people are smart and ethical and donate blood regardless of some stupid placard (in which case you don't need it) or they're stupid and/or have questionable ethical principles in which case the stupid placard may change their decision in either direction.
You're trying to have your cake and eat it too:
> People are so stupid that they need to be shown a sexualised little girl to be motivated to donate blood, but they're also smart and would never let such a perverse graphic dissuade them from donating blood.
MAKES TOTAL SENSE
The last time I explained this to you, you were too stupid to grasp it. I doubt that anything changed, but maybe the other people reading this will understand.