search_social@[email protected]
Following
0
Followers
0
Posts
42
Imported by PSI
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>do you ever get tired
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>you wanna have sex, right? That is why dogs chase cars. That or I want to eat you. But then again, the black widow male chases the one going to eat him. Maybe I just want to dance. At first.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st >B-But I like to cook... And this is exactly the point. You are trans**gender**. And your condition isn't solved by mutilating your body (becoming trans**sex**). Your condition is solved by saying fuck society and cooking anyway. >Oh I fully agree that cooking is feminine. I was asking to explain why. Well, I don't think cooking is feminine. I think females are feminine. And anything they do is feminine. And it's true that females cook. But if I want to cook, I'm not going to let that stop me. And I'm a male, so anything I do is masculine. So cooking isn't anything. Men rear children too, it's called being a dad, and a dad's absence fucks children up. Men sew, it's called being a tailor. Men play with dolls, they're called action figures. Men wear dresses, they're called kilts. Men are secretaries, it's called the Secretary of State (and it used to mean something). Men can be empathic, it's called being a pastor (not the pedo kind). If a man wants to do something, the correct response is to do it. If females did that thing before, it makes no difference. This is literally the heart of true leftist philosophy (being gender-**blind**, just like being race-**blind**), so the fact that modern "leftists" have perverted it is strange and indicitive of either incompetence, corruption, or both.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>It's a distinction without a difference. No you aren't thinking. It is **consistent** for you to believe that transsex and transgender are the same, because you **also** believe that sex and gender are the same. But it is **not consistent** for the left to believe that transsex and transgender are the same, because the left **does not** believe that sex and gender are the same. Catching someone in an **inconsistency** is how you distinguish [pun] between a well-intentioned incompetent and a mal-intentioned liar. And **that** is a distinction with a difference. Know thine enemy. @Godcast@poa.st @Bro-Drillard@poa.st @HerewardtheWOKE@poa.st @MaleGoddess@poa.st @TransGal4872@fedi.absturztau.be
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>le hipster trying to squish esotericism into his stunted liberal metaphysics has arrived Well no, you are just arguing in bad faith. Your true argument is "Nothing is feminine or masculine from first principles."; but of course that sounds stupid when you say it out loud, so you tried to disguise it by asking a trap [pun] question, and when I reversed the trap on you (by making you fill in your own example to stonewall on), you dodged the question instead of admitting your premise.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>Give an argument from first principles why cooking is feminine. Cooking was just an example. You can substitute any hobby or personality trait you wish. Such as playing the flute, or introversion versus extroversion.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>Please provide any mechanism by which the sex of the body and the sex of the brain ("gender") would actually be seperately determined Exactly as previously stated: |Crotch|Likes Cooking?|Sex|Gender| |Penis|No|Male|Male| |Vagina|Yes|Female|Female| |Penis|Yes|Male|Female| |Vagina|No|Female|Male| Note that the trans**gender** conditions (3 and 4) are easily solved by marrying each other. No body mutiliation (trans**sexual** surgery) is required. This is why the left 1984'd the word trans**sexual** from the lexicon, to gaslight 3 and 4 away from marrying each other and into body mutilation.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>trans**sex**ualism is an aberration And that's exactly my point. Trans**gender** is fine. Trans**sex** is not. So why does the left conflate the two? @Bro-Drillard@poa.st >You're expecting mental illness to be self-consistent and make sense... No, I'm expecting **Reality** to be self-consistent and make sense. Physical illness follows rules. And bad actors can use poison to induce physical illness on purpose. And they can be traced through those same rules. @Godcast@poa.st @HerewardtheWOKE@poa.st @MaleGoddess@poa.st @TransGal4872@fedi.absturztau.be
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>how can trannies have a male vs female brain? It's very simple: the brain is **gender** and the body is **sex**. If a man wants to cook, which is clearly a job for women, then he clearly has a female brain, and he is clearly trans**gender**. However he is not trans**sex**, which would be stupid, he is just a man that cooks. The left deliberately calls trans**sex** abominations "trans**gender**" in order to gaslight men that should have just been male chefs into castrating themselves just to step into a kitchen. @MaleGoddess@poa.st @Godcast@poa.st @TransGal4872@fedi.absturztau.be @HerewardtheWOKE@poa.st
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>"gender" is a concept made up by a leftist Then riddle me this - | If | *the left* | CREATED | *the distinction between* | **sex** | **gender** | | Then why | *the left* | ERASED | *the distinction between* | trans**sex** | trans**gender** |
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>There's a common misconception that words somehow cannot be used to cause action, and cannot be used to cause harm. No, the misconception is how the fuck is it possible to determine what harm has been caused when you fucks ban the very process that makes determining what the fuck is going on in the first place impossible - SPEECH. >Free Speech ≠ Free from consequences of your speech. Careful what you wish for.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>cum I am indeed quite the fan of sex-positive feminism. Pity that modern censors have returned to the castity chages of the 400-year-old catholic church under the shameless banner of being "progressive". https://www.idrlabs.com/feminist-perspectives/test.php @eris@disqordia.space @grumbulon@shitposter.club @pernia@freespeechextremist.com
Feminist Perspectives Test
Feminist Perspectives Test, based on the work of Dr. Nancy Henley, Ph.D.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>Almost every flavor of leftist is allowed on Twitter and Facebook. False. [Alexandra Elbakyan was yeeted by Twatter](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/twitter-shuts-down-account-sci-hub-pirated-papers-website). @eris@disqordia.space >been the mainstream culture for like **400 years** False. It was the mainstream culture for like **370 years**, whereas man-hating has been the mainstream culture for the past **30 years**. Sadly, as I have only been alive the past **30 years**, I have little appreciation for posers pretending that they had anything to do with the preceding **370 years** when they have not.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/twitter-shuts-down-account-sci-hub-pirated-papers-website).
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>the binary that is in tension over controlling the population is the government vs corporate America (with a heavy **Venn diagram overlap**). **Venn diagram**, activate! #YearOfDecentralization #YearOfTheFediverse .
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>Niggers are such a backwards people that a single solitary empty coke bottle nearly destroys their tribal lifestyle Oh? What did it take to nearly destroy yours? @MistakeNot@poa.st @Rhodesian_YuKari@poa.st @AzusaWifeHaver@varishangout.net
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>mucho texto zoom zoom
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>No choice **Panel 4** of 6. It's not a mainga, so **Panel 4** is on **the right not the left**. Other appearances of Sartre are catalogued here: ``https://existentialcomics [dot] com/philosopher/Jean_Paul_Sartre``
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>What does it mean to be a man, anyway? I think the most important is being "active" as opposed to "passive", as being in control of and choosing your own destiny. Whether that be through physical training, or studying forbidden knowledge, or stalking the girl and shaping her feelings, or machiavellian manipulation of the people around you. https://www.idrlabs.com/king-warrior-magician-lover/test.php Of course anything too threatening like the way I put it above is rather brutally suppressed, but even a minor rendition of those archetypes would really help a lot of the /r9k/ robot stories I heard. I do not think it matters if there is an escapist domain like Sword Art Online or a banal domain like a high school; I only think it matters if the male character is rewarded for being active rather than passive. >and their cuteness is their virtue. There's nothing wrong with that; they just have to understand that they are cute **men** not cute **women**. Teemo and Gnar come to mind. Or to be more precise - there is nothing wrong with being trans**gender** (mind, behavior); there is only something wrong with being trans**sex** (body). I think it is telling that the same people that explained how **gender** and **sex** are distinct suddenly deliberately conflated the terms. Men can play with dolls and wear dresses, we just call them action figures and kilts. Why has this potential choice been covered up? >Kirito Apparently there is something already written on him: >Usually, the complaint with male characters who have all the girls falling for them in anime is that the character does nothing to earn it; the girls just fall for him because it's in the script. In Kirito's case, he's extremely skilled at the game and actively uses his skills to help people weaker than him [...] in other words, the girls who like him have actual legit reasons for liking him. You can say that Kirito is too competent and noble and it strains credulity, or you can say that the girls on this show are dumb for liking him, but not both. The idea that the girls like a guy who is competent and also nice paints them as good judges of character, versus mindless objects who like a character for no apparent reason. >Karen Mead, Japanator.com[6] @kreischer@kiwifarms.cc @cassidyclown@kiwifarms.cc
Show more
King, Warrior, Magician, Lover Test
King, Warrior, Magician, Lover Test, based on the work of Robert L. Moore, Ph.D. and Douglas Gillette.
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>the literal sense of just some nerdy dude going to school trying to make friends I would say that (actively) going to school and (actively) trying to make friends would help solve most /r9k/ robots problems, actually. >but are masculinely jovial as oppose to the cute, sparkly feminine kind I think being cute, sparkly feminine would also help so long as its genuine and not based in body mutiliation. * lmao Ouran High School Hostclub * Goku * Naruto Thanks! >Ask some weebs Okey dokey. I'll re-phrase my "Law of Attraction" question as - what anime character would make your waifu happy? @cassidyclown@kiwifarms.cc @PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
search_social
Reply to @[email protected]
>There are Can you tell me one that would be commonly-recognized by weebs? A "happy" one I mean not Light or L. >a generic self-insert male protagonist Sounds good to me, that's all a Clint Eastwood movie is anyway.