@sapphire@poa.st @AlmostAmerican@poa.st @RacistZikaBaby@poa.st @creamqueen@poa.st @slovborg@poa.st See it's not that I or anyone else thinks jacking it to lolicon is as bad as consuming real child porn or molesting kids. No one thinks that. It's just that ANY pedophilic content is already crossing a line. It's plain and simply just horrible, horrible optics and the worst subject matter ever. At absolute best if you DO have those interests and were NOT a narcissistic autist you'd at least be closeted about your lolicon interest and not proclaim it proudly on social media in a clearly voyeuristic way. It's transparent what you lolicons do. You are so obnoxious about it because it gives you a big histrionic dopamine rush. Deep down you know it's repugnant to normal people beyond anything else sans real CP. And yes it IS pedophilic content despite being a drawing. To deny such is sophistry. I'll explain why with an example This image I attached is homosexual content. It's a drawing but it is still homosexual. It is a manifestation of my urge as a homosexual to like cute anime boys in intimate scenarios. I would never deny this is a manifestation of my faggotry as a gay man to like this—the fact it is a drawing does NOT detract from the fact that this content is, in fact, homosexual. Likewise by the same logic lolicon is pedophilic content. The fact that it does not include real children does not preclude this fact in the sense that it is a manifestation of the same sexual "fetish" for lack of a better term. Understand? There are cases where things labeled lolicon are ambiguous, sure. I'm talking about when it's clearly "matrixing" what a pedophile would be into—not just an ambiguously short, cute girl in a vacuum. Proportions are more important than say, height for example.