At this point, boosting foxxo pictures in my timeline is a reflex

Now that almost all anime from this season has come to an end, I'm bored as fuck

@fluffy@social.handholding.io This particular problem has bit me in the ass multiple times already.

@fluffy@social.handholding.io For instance, I can define a function that takes a number parameter: `function (arg: number) { ... }`. Then I set it as an onClick handler in a Bootstrap-Vue application: `onClick={this.thefunction}`. Bootstrap-Vue doesn't check if the function fits, its TypeScript definitions are basically YOLO. So what happens if Bootstrap-Vue calls the function with a string argument instead? At compile-time nothing, because TS sees no problem. But at runtime you'll probably get some weird problems that are hard to debug because you expect the types to be fine.

@fluffy@social.handholding.io Yes, but also the fact that TypeScript is just a very thin layer on top of JS that retains all of its weaknesses and leads devs to make false assumptions that can result in bugs. I still prefer using TS over not using it, but eh....

> absolutely loving TypeScript Don't worry, that won't last long

@nosleep@neckbeard.xyz @toromino@fedi.absturztau.be Become avocado

@a1batross@expired.mentality.rip

@absturztaube@fedi.absturztau.be Henlo

Emojis will forever be incomplete as long as they lack :ugly:

@amolith@nixnet.social I just wanted to be fair since I only kept nomming the javocado, but never the amocado

@a1batross@expired.mentality.rip

"No talk me, I'm angy"

@feli@universe.feliver.se Hmm, are you sure he isn't just sleepwalking

@solidsanek@outerheaven.club Starting today, I am cat. Meow

Aaand the interference is now so bad my WiFi-controlled power sockets can't reliably be controlled anymore because they lose connection all the time