anyway as far as im concerned there is no purpose for hyper realistic or other depictions of nude children or children being fucked beyond sexual gratification to the user consuming it. I'm not comfortable with it but my moderation team has laid out their rules so if you have issues direct them at @PoastSupport@poa.st

@graf@poa.st @PoastSupport@poa.st so let me get this straight, loli is fine but like realistic drawing isnt?

@creamqueen@poa.st 👉👉👉👉 @PoastSupport@poa.st

@graf@poa.st @PoastSupport@poa.st 502 error

@creamqueen@poa.st @PoastSupport@poa.st

@creamqueen@poa.st Yeah, nothing extremely realistic, and don't mention age unless it's 18+. Remilia Scarlet is canonically over 500 years old.

@creamqueen@poa.st @graf@poa.st realistic 3d renderings of underage looking people in pornographic/sexual situations are not allowed. This 'art' style is rampant on some fediverse instances.

@PoastSupport@poa.st @graf@poa.st so say for instance, koikatsu loli is fine but, but honey select 2 loli is not

@creamqueen@poa.st @graf@poa.st all of those styles are fine if they do not involve children or underage looking people.

@PoastSupport@poa.st @graf@poa.st thanks for clarification

@creamqueen@poa.st @graf@poa.st to be frank this issue of '3d porn' was a specific problem, and widely reported, from the baraag instance. It was decided material like that was far to obscene to be on this site.

@PoastSupport@poa.st @graf@poa.st i agree.