Public
Federated
Thread
Umlauts
>watching Star Trek: Enterprise
>chief engineer and vulcan science officer ends up having an argument that boils down to "muh individualism" vs " muh tradition"
>even pre-federation humans are so deracinated they can't conceptualise higher values than "muh individual rights"
>Vulcan science officer of course ends up going with "muh individualism" because it's Star Trek
>character arc is probably going to be her (the vulcan) liberalising over the season
That said, fuck the Vulcans. Pointy eared deceptive "muh logic" idolaters. Always hated the "muh logic" philosophy of the Vulcans, always just been pretences that those fuckers have used to hide their jewy motives with.
Umlauts
replyReply to @[email protected]
Come to think of it, the Vulcans are even jewier than the Ferengi. The Ferengi are at least honest with being a bunch of greedy space kikes and can even be affable. The Vulcans however pretend to be a superior muh logic enlightened race while just being a bunch of scheming manipulators only looking out for #1


mall0ry 苦レモン
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Umlauts@poa.st
> Always hated the "muh logic" philosophy of the Vulcans, always just been pretences that those fuckers have used to hide their jewy motives with.
kek, i do too.
I think what makes it so bullshit is that it is written by midwit liberals who can't into, muh logic proper.
They "know" what is "good" must also be true.
Thus, it is self evident that muh logic will eventually prove liberal values beyond reproach.
They don't know how, but the lab coat dudes surely must?
Umlauts
replyReply to @[email protected]
@mute_city@poa.st It annoys me even more that not a single human character just refutes the "muh logic" philosophy by just refuting the logic=truth mindset or getting the Vulcans tripped up on logical paradoxes etc.

mall0ry 苦レモン
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Umlauts@poa.st
> philosophy by just refuting the logic=truth mindset or getting the Vulcans tripped up on logical paradoxes etc.
They kind of do that.
"Dammit Sperk! Not everything in the universe can be understood by cold reason. You also have to FEEL!!!111!!"
- then sperk gets schooled by reality itself, on why this is so.
Roddenberry is of the tribe?
Umlauts
replyReply to @[email protected]
@mute_city@poa.st Wiki claims he was allegedly raised Southern baptist. But I'm not a trekkie, so I've never cared to go deep into it. He's obviously philo-semitic as fuck though.

mall0ry 苦レモン
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Umlauts@poa.st
> He's obviously philo-semitic as fuck though.
:)
Sorry man, too much coffee, what you think of the following?
The vulkans illustrate the relation of the liberal to SCIENCE(tm).
They idolize scientists and often feel inferior to them.
Spock hangs out with them, but only in a supporting role, does their bidding and is effectively sexless - lol.
-> Science is only to affirm liberal believes, not inform them.
Spock: "But every form of aggression is inheritly illogical"
( Game theory couldn't disagree more - but that must mean it's just incomplete, right?
Spock is a scientist from the future - a peek into how much more harder future science will affirm us then it already does!
Pulpit - whoohoo :)
)
But science is also incomplete, because can't feel.
It is us, liberals, in which rests the key that completes mere knowledge into wisdom.
Umlauts
replyReply to @[email protected]
@mute_city@poa.st Never seen ToS, also sounds like you're way overthinking it.
>Spock: "But every form of aggression is inheritly illogical"
I just saw an episode of Enterprise where the big tiddy Vulcan science officer said something like "Vulcans don't believe meeting violence with violence" and got BTFO'd on that point the same episode. Those pointy eared space nerds are in need of getting shoved into a locker on a civilizational scale.
tengumatingpress
replyReply to @[email protected]
@Umlauts@poa.st @mute_city@poa.st I always assumed he was a yid after hearing about how he shoehorned lyrics into the theme that never played in the actual show so he could get a cut of the royalties.