@Springnat@poa.st No way to know the exact number. However estimates range from 5.6 million via census to slightly over 6 million. The census is a problem because during the war they stopped doing them. so any child born in that time after they stopped doing them , who was killed , was an invisible statistic. In auschwitz everyone under the age of 14 was gassed up until late 44. So lots of kids were likely not in that census

@Springnat@poa.st ya around 9 million. After the war it was about 3

@Springnat@poa.st https://imgur.com/a/AmD9Cvn

@Springnat@poa.st death camps started being operational in 1942 and were in full swing by 1943. The last gassings took place in auschwitz in october of 44.

@Springnat@poa.st combined death toll of all the reinhard camps is 2.7 million

@Springnat@poa.st depends on the camp. In auchwitz they were burned and dumped in the river. In the first reinhard camps (that shut down in late 1943) they buried them , then after the katyn massacre was discovered the germans decided it would be better to dig up the bodies and burn them. The graves are still there. The other 3 million were killed by death squads

@Wyatt@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st You do realize it's physically impossible to burn a body to ash in an open air fire, let alone millions of them. It doesn't get hot enough and would take so much wood the entire surrounding area would be completely deforested. In order to burn the bodies to ash they would need to use burn barrels, otherwise there would be skeletal remains fully intact making burning them to cover up the mass graves moot.

@Wyatt@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st This actually came up in the documentary Making a Murderer. They accused Steven Avery of disposing of the dead woman by burning her body to ash in an open air burn pit. They brought in a guy who was the biggest expert on cremation and burning bodies in the world as an expert witness and he confirmed that it was impossible to burn a body to ash using an open air fire and they he would have needed a burn barrel. There was a burn barrel near by but no traces of burning a human being to ash could be found so this was used as evidence for the defense that there could not have been human remains burned to ash in a giant bonfire.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st "burn barrel" yes similar to a burn trench

@Wyatt@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st A burn trench wouldn't work. You can try this yourself. Take a raw thankgiving turkey, dig a hole in your back yard, start a wood fire, see if you can burn it down to ash including the bones. You can't.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Shit, modern crematoriums were having problems keeping up with covid deaths

@MistakeNot@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st might have something to do with the fact they were not shoving in a new body every 20 minutes

@Wyatt@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st might have something to do with the fact that they were operating maximum capacity because you can't just shove more shit into the oven, and even if you could, the ovens still have a maximum rate they cremate bodies at. Even if it was physically possible that you could burn one every 25 minutes, that doesn't mean the oven itself is capable of operating like that, continuously.

@MistakeNot@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st i mean the designers of the ovens say otherwise. They literally said use multiple bodies in letters.

@Wyatt@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st A) that's entirely not what I'm talking about and you know it B) i'm supposed to believe the words of a guy who they didn't execute for crimes against humanity? Could he have... cut a deal perhaps? Is it not clear that we don't trust somethings some people allegedly said or wrote down, when we have massive issues with the fact that we can't inspect the evidence first hand? You're gonna post some faggot who is crying about how deniers are 'moving the goal posts' when first foremost we have issues with the fact that the primary evidence was destroyed, and all we have is secondary evidence?

@MistakeNot@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st the primary evidence is the fact that 6 million jews disappeared during the war lmfao

@Wyatt@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Corpus delicti faggot, where are the six million corpses.

@MistakeNot@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st ash at the bottom of a river or in a mass grave its not complicated

@Springnat@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st I dont believe your math on ash is incorrect. Modern crematoriums have reburners. the crematoriums at auschwitz had chimneys. Its common history that it "rained ash" in the towns around these places

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st you said earlier they used trench burns with burn barrels because the crematorium facility didn't have enough throughput

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st trying to understand where im wrong here.

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st you're wrong in stating the trench burners had reburners

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st what

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st if the trench burners were used due to inadequate capacity they would have been lower tech than the permanent crematorium facilities and would not have had secondary burners, which would reduce efficiency drastically. Also you said it "rained ash". It is not possible for a system with a functional secondary burner to exhaust ash out the draft pipe

@Springnat@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st There is no evidence the Gas chambers even existed in the first place. Never mind the retarded deisel engine gassings that wouldn't even have worked because diesel exhaust contains too much oxygen to suffocate people. Would have been easier to put them into an air tight room and let them die of CO2 poisoning from their own breathing.

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st the germans didn't even use diesel

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st That's correct, which is why the official narrative at Treblinka is that they used a captured soviet submarine engine to pump diesel exhaust into the gas chambers.

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st lololololol

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st Have you never seen 1/3rd of the Holocaust. Dean Irebod does a deep dive on the entire holocaust besides Auchwitz, which is even more fake and gay and unbelievable than Auchwitz. https://www.bitchute.com/video/MQxyferx8mht/

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st I have seen all of these they dont hold much water

@Wyatt@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st If you really think this why not debate someone who's job it is to deny the holocaust (TDS)?

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st I already debated mike on twitter. it came down to authority of documents vs authority of dudes who scraped shit off walls and did bad science

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st i.e. no evidence for extreme claims

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st more like "scientists" who did bad science and made dumb claims. Basically people like rudolf proved the existence of hydrogen cyanide above background levels but below that of a fumigation chamber yet somehow this doesnt prove it was a gas chamber (which used a extremely lower PPM of hydrogen cyanide) and a ventilation system that cleared out the chamber before staining could occur

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st If your performance on here was anything like on twitter vs. Mike you must've gotten slaughtered.

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st again it was documents vs bad scientists.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st So jewish bullshit vs actual science?

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st this is ultimately why you cant win against holocaust deniers because once in a corner everything just becomes jewish bullshit or "they deserved it good"

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st This is why no one takes you seriously, you say shit like "It's bad science look at muh documents"

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st no i mean its literally bad science. Their hypothesis was that by taking samples from the gas chambers and comparing them to fumigation chambers , they could confirm the lack of massive amounts of HCN residue or none at all. Confirming they were not gas chambers Instead what happened is they DID find HCN residue , and it was above background levels. Which means the area was exposed to HCN directly. However they try to dodge this devastating self own by moving the goal posts to prussian blue , which is a chemical reaction in which HCN stains walls. They try to use this as an argument that it would be impossible for these chambers to exist without this staining. While ignoring completely the fact that not only did the gas chambers not use nearly as much HCN as fumigation chambers. But also at a MASSIVELY different time scale (less than an hour vs days of exposure). There was also the ventilation system Like i said. Dogshit science and they rightly got ruined and also at the same time proved the gas chambers existed by going outside the law and from a skeptic background.

@Wyatt@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st They did not find more HCN than background levels. The HCN in the gas chambers matched the control samples taken from buildings not said to be gas chambers, and buildings that were not even in the camp. You are either misinformed, or you are lying.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st yes they did they found higher than normal HCN samples thats why they cried about prussian blue because if they didnt find higher than background it would be open and shut.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st They didn't find higher than background though. You are lying, Post results.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st yeah they did. In leucters report he literally says "this is because of fumigation" as a cope like i said. It was bad science. Out of the two though leucter is border line retarded and his report is so hilariously absent of basic understanding of how science works its funny.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st I'm not talking about the Leuchter report. Post the results from Germar Rudolphs Chemestry of Auchwitz where he said he found traces of cyanide in the gas chamber that differed from the control sample. The Book is right here: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=2

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st woah wait so is the leucter samples not reliable only rudolfs? Because Jan Markiewicz went in with his own team not hoping to find anything because of the exposure the place had to the weather and the lack of plaster and still found higher than background HCN all over the building. so we have one denier forensic sample saying higher than background and one non denier saying higher than background. Who is right?

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Yes, Rudolph goes through all the mistakes in the Leuchter report, which is why he went and did the analysis the proper way in the first place wrote an entire book on it in autistic detail step by step showing his experiments, the results, and every possible angle on this topic you can think of. Everyone knows the Leuchter report is flawed, Rudolph's results are the gold standard.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st he got blown the fuck out too https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st No he didn't. You don't even know what his experiments were or what his results were. You probably do not even know how to evaluate them yourself, let alone be able to find the flaws in the argumentation at that link you posted. How do I know this? Because you've never read his book, only what other people have claimed is written in the book.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st You are asking me to delve deep into something i know for a fact isnt true. This stuff isnt new. its OLLLLLLDDDDD. its been debated for a LOOOOONGGG time. And the good thing about it is its been debunked hard. All of the hypohesis' he had made have been shattered. Because the issue with holocaust revisionists trying to do science is they are looking for the correct answer. Not "a" answer. 1. Was there cyanide above background at the gas chamber buildings? yes. Not only did leucter confirm this , but other teams did too. Rudolf was the only one apparently who found nothing 2. Is prussian blue relevant? no , because of the operation of the gas chamber , its matiainence , and and ventilation , there would have been none if any compared to a fumigation chamber. Nothing else to talk about beyond that. He has been DEBOOOOONNKKKED https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st LOL no you are completely incorrect and have no clue what you are talking about. There are only 3 groups of people who looked at this. Leuchter, Rudolph, and these idiot poles hired by the Polish Government to refute Rudolph. Cyanide reacts with the Iron in the bricks in the walls. This is the compound that would still be around decades later since it's stable. The idiot poles did their analysis and did not even look for Iron Cyanide and found trace amounts of the other cyanide compounds that are the same in basically every brick material. Then they said look the gas chamber brick has the same amount of these cyanide compounds as the delousing chambers and called it proof. LOL Man you are a total joke. You have no idea what you are talking about and it shows. No wonder you are a LOLcow.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st he got OWNED He had to move goal posts HARD.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st LOL so you are going with the debunked poles who didn't even look for Iron Cyanide. They tried to claim the prussian blue outside the delousing chambers that seeped through the brick was probably paint or something retarded. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! Never mind the fact the so called gas chambers stuffed with thousands of people getting gassed would have made the environment so humid that the pellets couldn't even off gas, and even if they did the moisture would have made the cyanide absorb into the bricks like a sponge causing them to be totally saturated in Iron Cyanide. You know absolutely nothing bud. You don't even know what the claims are let alone have the knowledge to debunk them. You are a Joke.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st "muh zyklon off gassing being impacted by muh people" oh god please stop lmfao. "absorb into the bricks" there were no bricks. The entire chamber was plastered over and cleaned after every gassing. It would never have reached the bricks.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Also cleaning it would only make the plaster even more wet, causing it to absorbe more cyanide causing it to wick and be absorbed completely though the plaster and into the brick walls behind the plaster as proven in the experiments.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Also ventilation would do absolutely nothing to prevent this from happening, as proven in the experiments which you did not read and are totally ignorant about.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st i just scrolled through the book and despite hundreds of expensive color illustrations not a single one exists of his experiments and their results. maybe you can help me out?

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st He sperged out into more austistic Detail on the experiements in his Second Book: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/trr/

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st This looks to be the relevant section:

@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st He not only covers his own findings, but the findings of all of the other people who analyzed the materials.

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st no i dont care about his sample taking i care about his experiments remaking it

@Wyatt@poa.st when a historical event is so true it's illegal to question it in 16 european countries

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st this isn't working anymore, you've gone past the point at which a person who actually believed what he was saying would have sperged out and started either demanding to know how much money we make or schizoposting

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st I think that stuff is in this section:

@Springnat@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st i didnt say that. I said within 20 minutes the body has reduced in size enough that new bodies can be added. dont lie

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st i just looked. No images of his experiments , or how they are set up. This data is worse than worthless it could be literally fucking made up

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st yeah pal you read through that entire section in 2 minutes LOL. My ass. Hur dur no pictures in a science paper, must be fake LOL. RETARD

@LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st no im serious. without images describing his test set up you literally cannot confirm a fucking thing he says. He could be throwing a plaster covered brick in a box with some cyanide and say "look see it went through the brick!"

@Wyatt@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st The poles who you rely on could have faked their tests, faked pictures, faked data, etc. Do you still believe them?

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st I only use that for refutation. Its undeniable what these buildings are just based on the number of cremation ovens inside them and their proximity to a mirrored building on the other side of the road.

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st lol bullshit. Number of ovens does not equal mass extermination.

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st uh ya it does. Most concentration camps in the reich had 1 or 2 ovens max. auschwitz had something like 42

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Why does that prove that there was a mass-extermination event?

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st because that amount of ovens can cremate the entire camps population in a month. there is literally no reason for this amount of ovens to exist in one small area of a camp unless its to dispose of a massive and constant stream of bodies. Typhus is not an argument because then other camps would have had similar facilities

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st can i prove what? that 40 some ovens can cremate like 100k people in a month? not anymore than i can convince you the gas chambers were real dude. The problem is this. You have a camp. A large one. A huge population of workers (so why would you need this many ovens?) and a railway heading straight for these facilities. Why so many ovens for a hypothesis (typhus) that other camps handle with just 1 or 2 ovens? we are not talking about Double or TRIPLE the amount of ovens of other camps. We are talking about a MASSIVE amount. 40 some ovens. maybe the largest concentration of such machines in history. You explain what they were for

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st So you can't prove it. Thank you for admitting that your entire point is moot. The burden is on you to prove to me that your god (the holocaust) is real, and you have failed to do so, instead insisting that all these muffles must mean gas chambers and mass extermination. Go outside.

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st "muh burden of proof" bro put the fedora down for a second and listen to the argument 40 ovens each oven capable of burning (with wrong math) 1 body an hour. Thats 960 people A DAY

@Springnat@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st modern crematorium take 3 hours because its for funeral purposes. not because of technical limitations or thermal barriers

@SuperCasualComfyPoaster@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st its not disingenious. You can keep burning the remains and the ash you get will be finer and finer. This is what they present to families. You can find many resources saying it takes only about an hour to cremate a body to completion. but cremation for presentation is different

@Wyatt@poa.st @SuperCasualComfyPoaster@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st Anyone who is this invested in the narrative is a Jew/bad faith actor, has a humiliation fetish, or is an eternal contrarian. Which are you?

@Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @SuperCasualComfyPoaster@poa.st that last one

@Wyatt@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @SuperCasualComfyPoaster@poa.st So you don't even believe the words you are typing?

[email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st [email protected]@poa.st

@Wyatt@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st it's easier to not believe that the holocaust happened after reading @Wyatt@poa.st posts. the sheer amount of bullshit it stinks of, all those videos of the fake victims, the fake accounts of the horrible conditions, the hundreds of doctored images... the holocaust did not happen

@Negi@poa.st @milk@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st Nah because Holocaust revisionists like Germar Rudolph have gone beyond asking people to prove the Holocaust happened, to providing enough evidence out right proving the holocaust did not happen for sure 100%.

@Negi@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st @milk@poa.st You have no arguments against Germar Rudolph, this is why you quote Karl the Cuck when his name is mentioned.

@Negi@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @LorgarAurelian1488@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st I read those articles and the one account of evidence expeditions in the camps and find little credible evidence to support an event like the holocaust. Just some jews that died of typhus, malnutrition, or other ways POWs die. Holocaust was a fucking psyop and you fell for it

@Negi@poa.st @milk@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st I've read the shit on that site long before you posted it. I already know what is written.

@Negi@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st @milk@poa.st Yes, I've spent thousands of hours just on this topic over the last decade. Every argument you could possibly make I've already heard 100 times and can recall the refutation from memory without even having to look it up because I am an autist who remembers just about everything I've ever read.

@Negi@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st @milk@poa.st The reason you think that is you are not even familiar with the Chemistry of Auschwitz, or any of the claims Germar Rudolph makes, or any of the experiments he did, or any of the data. You do not even know the high level concepts let alone the sperg chemistry details.

@Negi@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @Donald_McRonald@poa.st @MistakeNot@poa.st @Springnat@poa.st @Wyatt@poa.st @milk@poa.st He also wrote for people with a Chemistry Background in his 2nd book. The Chemistry of Auchwitz is for the Layman. Since you are an undergrad in Chemistry who is such an expert please explain how Rudolph is wrong in detail.