I think Lavrov was discussing an intra-white history of wars between Europe and Russia, making the point that it was European rulers rather than American rulers who were the instigators. Certainly, you could debate on some of the (((European rulers))), but I don't think he was doing the typical anti-colonialism argument, which has no bearing on Europe or Russia. In that sense, he is correct. Most of the brother wars were not started by Russia. You should keep in mind that the Judeo-American anti-white race ideology does not exist in Russia, and a man like Lavrov would likely not have any idea to parrot such nonsense like you would see coming out of American libtards. But, perhaps I am misunderstanding your issue with his statement. WN is a broader worldview which can be applied in numerous ways. It is not relevant what any individual says it means. If you're pro-white and you disagree with other pro-whites, that's ok. Just speak in good faith, ignore those who don't, and have respectful discussions with everyone else. Russia is not a WN state. I've seen some people make that claim, but it is simply not true. They are something close to a conservative civ-nat state, with less jewish subversion. Personally, I view Russia as positive in that they resist global zog ambitions, and negative in that they are not an explicitly pro-white entity. Russia is not my enemy, but it doesn't mean that Putin is a white savior either. I respect that Russia is a serious country which acts in its own interests, even if don't particularly like their state's worldview. Ukraine is occupied by a low iq jewish junta that has a centuries old hate for slavs.