Naur. I think you were correct about the jeet prayer. It had a massive effect on the GOP. Trump isn't even sworn in yet & already one of the few people that was worth a bit more than piss in a pan Matt Gaetz is not only AG, but also just resigned his seat in the 119th Congress even though he was also reelected on Nov 4th. & You still might be right about Kamaler. They might do some sanctimonious bullshit like have 🅱️iden step down within a month from now just to have that creature sworn in as 47th as a dig at both Trump & GOP voters. To be able to say "first wahmen President" but also to fuck over Trump's merch machine where he's selling shit as "45th & 47th" President.

Trump and Musk are openly threatening 1B$ campaigns against last remaining RINOs in 2026 reelections for congress.

Where is the $1B going to come from?

Musk.

It would be almost impossible to move that much capitol without breaking numerous campaign laws that are already on the books. Seems like a dead-end.

What if the Republicans just keep the Ukraine grift going? Instead of funneling it back to the DNC we just send it to the RNC.

It's already a uni-party system at the root. The ones that run things aren't likely to tolerate real in-fighting or adversely moving pots of honey around to wage a political war inside the US.

Wtf is the uni-party, huh? I'm not discussing schiozoid theories on politics and power. All over the world shit is changing constantly throughout history, but we're going to be shitting here about how there's only one shadow cabal running the show.

> Wtf is the uni-party, huh? > I'm not discussing schiozoid theories on politics and power. Ok... keep believing the political kayfabe then. It's not about Dem, Rep, or any 'elected representative' that casts votes in the US. It's special interest lobbys that controls those votes. What would you call that system?

>What would you call that system? Most distributed and democratized access to power since Rome, with much less political assassinations. Beach about it.

The same groups are paying both sides of the aisle. It's a well-know fact. Is there something about this you disagree with?

No, but you're harboring the idea that it's a set up, a con. Realistically we are dividing ourselves mostly 50/50 around ideas/decision purely as a mathematical function. Since we're making typically a decision between for and against, the competition line will lie in between. We're even set up for it at a genetic level. Our genetic traits that make us more favorable towards left/right, liberal/conservative or X/Y are also distributed 50/50. There are of course other factors, but claiming anything in the background decisively pulling the strings is FUCKING RETARDED. Even if there's a more less clean cut decision to be made, as much as it can in politics, 60/40 you will still have "center opportunist" gunning for the other losing side, because that's how natural pressures fall onto the board. After all, if that's too complicated for you, then yeah, it's a uniparty. However history unfolds, some nigger faggot kike has willed it. LOL

> There are of course other factors, but claiming anything in the background decisively pulling the strings is FUCKING RETARDED. Lobbyist groups broker backroom deals every single day. It's what they're designed to do. Elections in the US are cyclical and have very little (if any) effect on public policy. 50/50 splits are part of the kayfabe to keep the illusion going. The general public is not really part of the process.

Lobbyist groups are playing the same 50/50 game against each other in those back rooms. You think one kike capitalist says to another kike capitalist "hey, it's your turn to make millions and millions on X, i want you to have this", FUCKING LOL. They're all competing as hard as they can and they all have their circumstances up and down stream.

Do you think the rise and promotion of transgenderism is something that was wholly organic?

No, it was a multi decade campaign from faggots and faggot lovers. Naturally supported by 15-20% of society, the over compassionate viable genetic defects. That's enough to try and fail, and fail they did.

Ok, so why would something, that in your words failed, gain such a massive foothold in the first place? How could it even become a concern if only a negligible number of people ever cared about it?

How did natsoc gain so much momentum in Germany, 20% pushed through an experiment that benefit the whole country and most got on board. Or do you think some shadow organization snapped their fingers and puff, natsoc.

I think there's a lot of reasons natsoc gained power. To just lay it on "20%" and call it a day is insanely reductionist >Or do you think some shadow organization An insane lack of nuance here. I'm not some sort of strict determinist. I don't think nothing can possibly happen without the approval of some hidden group. However, if you do believe in jewish power, you definitionally do believe there is some level of "shadow org(s) that pull strings in the background".

It was 20% at some point to make a difference, for "experiment to take hold and enthusiastically", contrary to modern "experiment fails and society rebels". Is this distinction to subtle? There's faggots and clinical schizos and kikes of all kinds in US that would naturally allow, enable and push for this. Add their libshit social circles and easily coerced friends and over time they have 20%.

1.) 20% seems like an arbitrary number. I don't know why you've decided that's the magic number here, and frankly that's not really what I'm interested in debating. 2.) Again, if you do believe in jewish power, you do believe in *some amount* of shady backroom under-the-table dealing. There is no way around that.

1. Yes, it fucking is. Whatever it was, it was enough for enough social support. 2. I'm not a "believer", i consider it factual and demonstrable. I also consider it retarded to believe them or whoever to have power SOME attribute to them. I also remember 50% people are <100 IQ and easily mislead.

Fag, you want to discuss the issue? Have you slapped your bitch yet?

I would love to discuss the issue if I could figure out what the hell you're even trying to communicate.

Here it goes. # >IDEA OF A UNI-PARTY IS FUCKING RETARDED AND I'M NOT GETTING THROUGH WITH THE IDEA OF DOWNSTREAM OF GENETICS HUMAN SOCIOPOLITICAL BEHAVIOR

Why does every politician receive money from AIPAC? Why is there a significant portion of each debate dedicated to who is the greatest candidate for israel? Why is implementing policies that would explicitly and/or specifically help Whites, particularly White men, a third rail for both parties?

Ok, you know there was a kike split on Trump, 79/21. Can you imagine even the kikes work under the same system. You think they don't have their entrenched faggots who push their agenda? If defeating libshits in major election equals to defeating majority of american kikery who presumably were all in favor of immigration and troon policies, then probably there's changes coming even on that front. How is that hard? You know you can play them as much as they play you, right? Even their power over GAE can be diminished? And it wasn't enough for them to steal second election in a row?

>You think they don't have their entrenched faggots who push their agenda? That kind of sounds like a uniparty to me >If defeating libshits in major election equals to defeating majority of american kikery If I am properly reading this poorly worded ESL verbal diarrhea, you're saying that beating shitlibs means you're defeating the jews by proxy, correct?

What I'm getting out of this is "vote republican even harder to win" First of all, you aren't even a native english speaker. You have zero stake in american politics. Second, we had four whole years of trump. Four whole extremely jewish years. You either have no idea what you are talking about or you are caved-in-skull retarded.

GAE exports it's problems and ideology to much of the world, partly through UN resolutions if you're not aware. Your nigger kike faggotry is spilling forcefully all over the world, including my corner. Also, i'm very much a fan of world peace, which again your previous nigger president and current senile president very much fuck up. Trump's four years were fucking great and peaceful, rooting for the guy if that's the only thing he manages.

>white_male >isn't

Is so. I wouldn't even rape you though.

>immediately thinking about gay rape Really nigger? Really??

I thought you were asking. Just clearing the air.

No sorry I think you're the only one here cruising for gay hookups.

Have you slapped the shit out of her? If she's still talking repeat.

In what language does that response make sense? Spanish? Hindi? Just trying to understand what kind of swarthoid I'm dealing with here

Oh, i blame women for the rapid socio political changes and ultimately troom/immigration experiment. Women, on a genetic level, are 5-10%(the variance is racial) more compassionate and prefer socialistic policies than men.

Are you indian

No.

Somehow I don't believe you when you say that.

That's why american right wing politics doesn't go anywhere, you guys aren't presentable. There's no nuance with you. Calling out kikes all day is fun, but you're not making any politics with that.

Easy there, no need to get all worked up, baljeet. I just wanted to know which bombay slum you live in.

Botom'syawell.

Nah I know your street-shitting ass is in new delhi

You know they basically let currymunchers into canada for free right? Go ahead and getcha some MAID done.

Bro, you're descending into cringe. Happy Trump 2025-2029, i hoop you voot next time too.

I'm not the one who super seriously believes in vooting. That's you, patel. Anyways, it's like 2 AM in your literal shithole country. Get some sleep.

I mean, i believe more in India's vooting system than your fucktardery.

Yeah, you would root for your own home team. Makes sense, rajnesh.

They also magically count all their 630.000.000 population's votes in ONE DAY. India numba won!

Man, I really do not give a fuck how you cow shit eating rapists do things over there, I promise you.