Public
Federated
Thread
TurboNormie
An interesting but now overlooked concept that cool doodz like @borzoi@poa.st were talking about 1-2 years ago was that of social technologies. I think this is important for understanding the situation we're in and why we're headed where we're headed with no brakes on the train.
Social technologies are the tools increasingly complex societies evolve to tamp down the worst/most socially destabilizing impulses of the human psyche. A very simple example found across all societies across all time would be bullying which is a group approach to reeling in a member whi has strayed too far from from social norms and also a way of enforcing social ostracization if they refuse to normalize. A more complex example would be the many informal roles the church played in traditional societies, from the priesthood's role in absorbing overproduction of elite males to its role in whitewashing social ills like illegitimate pregnancies by enforcing and officializing shotgun marriages.
I bring all of this up because I see this as the best way to describe a facet of modern society which explains much of the societal psychological insanity we witness on a daily basis. For all of Western/European civilization, social technologies have been serving primarily as a backstop against *resentment*. A fact of life is that once done, many things cannot be undone. Once a woman reaches menopause without children, any chance of being a mother is done. Once a man chooses momentary comfort over, let's say, planting next year's crop, he is done as there is no chance at a "do over" once the hunger pangs set in. This applies to the full spectrum of human behaviors with varying rates of marginal success but generally, such technologies were able to keep society on the rails even if they weren't universally effective.
Therein lies the problem, these technologies aren't universally effective. A certain culture of critique was introduced into our European societies that began to pick apart the more marginal approaches to limiting regret and resentment. Who's to say that marrying wildly beyond your class is unworkable? It works for plenty of couples! Nevermind it has a much higher rate of failure, nevermind the ressentiment that is bred into the children produced by such a marriage who will never be accepted by either class (same argument applies to interracial marriages but class disparities were the first entry point to break the whole institution). Eventually enough technologies have been broken or removed from the context of their original purpose that society goes off the rails.
Resentment breeds ressentiment and ressentiment breeds impulsive, destructive behavior lashing out at the perceived source of an individual or collective's grievance. What is important about all of this is that there is no social technology that can reel this back in. They only work to prevent the resentment-causing behaviors from reaching critical mass in the first place. Where we are in the process is so far past the point where a correction could be made that we are forced to watch as the current adult generations burn through their rage like a candle suddenly fueled by acetylene. Exhausting the fuel of ressentiment is the only way through but I warn you, there is more deadwood built up in this forest than anyone expects.
Show more
Bungler
replyReply to @[email protected]
@TurboNormie@poa.st @borzoi@poa.st
Beneficial social technologies work when ppl in power are willing to preserve them, or at least not actively dismantle them. You can see that still playing out in a country like Japan. But western liberalism is based on Progress, & every generation of liberals needs to out-progress & out-woke the previous one. Which means everything old is seen as a source of evil, so liberals can imagine something "better" to replace it with. Their Gnosticism & utopianism being a continuation of strands of thought of the esoteric traditions of the early modern era: the Rosicrucianism that influenced Descartes' ontology; the Hermetic utopian tradition as expressed in Campanella's City of the Sun & Andreae's Christianopolis.
At a certain point, Hermetic magic was abandoned, in favor of technology. But the magical impulse, of man to completely dominate & reshape the world under the power of his own wisdom, was never fully abandoned. Wilkin's Mathematical Magic, & Bacon's New Atlantis, illustrate this well. Hence, the drive for transhumanism: gnostic transcendence via technology.
God was also abandoned, in favor of depersonalized abstract principles, like "human rights", which, being unable to offer any Revelation of their own, only have the Enlightened & Educated to speak on their behalf. So our vainglorious lefist elite get to define what's true & good - & even redefine them, to pretend like that's what they've always been. & just like the Hermetic wizards of yore, they think they can reshape the world in their own image, by their own art - only instead of magic, they use "reason" & "science". Which they also get to define, & re-define.
Our elite are in love with their own vainglory. & they think we'd have gay space communism by now, if it just weren't for all those reactionary/kulak/counter-revolutionaries in the flyover states. All their programs & policies leading to disaster can never be their own fault: so they pass off the blame to the rest of us, for resisting the triumphant march of Progress. & they resent us for it. They resent our very existence. & the worse they make things, the more they're going to resent us, until they've collapsed the entire system they derive their power down upon us. After that, if we're still alive, we might can get the chance to rebuild a functional society.
Show more