>jews have no influence in britain t. twitter jew meanwhile https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/holocaust-denial-antisemitic-song-auschwitz-alison-chabloz-conviction-upheld-a8777991.html :^)

@Arty24@poa.st wasn't the greatest living historian in britain humiliated in british court not too long ago, for having the courage to sue someone for defamation when they said he lied about history

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Arty24@poa.st David Irving

@Samhydeigger@poa.st @Arty24@poa.st yup, apparently the guy he sued for defamation got half of hollywood to fund the defense and he got solidly trounced and then had to pay all of their legal fees, which bankrupted him. all because the guy was aligned with american jews. and britain and the british did nothing.

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st it was this jewess who's onen of the main proprietors of the holomyth, irving made the mistake of geteting in over his head and trying to argue that the whole holobunga was fake when he didn't know all the deets and just got suddenly redpilled by jews piling on him aftere releasing 'Hitler's War' in which he pointed out there's not proofs of any Hitler order iirc. Also the main 'historian' guy lipstadt got to argue against irving; Van Pelt, plagiarized a bunch of Preessac's work lol

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st oh did he try to make that argument? I confess I never looked at what angles they used in court.

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st in his book "hitler's war" baack in 1989 I think he made that point, jews proceeded to sperg out and produce a clearly fake document referred to as the "franke-Gricksch report" (really an alleged addendum) which had a bunch of dumb shit like "10k per day gassed (at Auschwitz) Irving was the one I think who found the original full report which made no mention of gassings etc. This likely was what made him redpilled on the jews at first if I understand correctly. (TDS did a big on it I can get you the vid if you want)

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Franke-Gricksch ah this is a pretty quick rundown from the revisionist perspective I think

@Samhydeigger@poa.st @Arty24@poa.st p from fse posted some links about that once. it's some sort of argument like his lieutenants used a particular conjugation of the verb transport sometimes but not always therefore it was secretly murder. that's the best of it, at least. i don't think there's any reason to think the big guy was involved, although they were pretty desperate at that stage, so who knows maybe it was as some say a sort of revenge on their enemies who would not let them make peace

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st TDS? I dont think anglin does videos

@Samhydeigger@poa.st @fluffy@social.handholding.io as for during the trial in 2000 itself, that's a whole different thing full of stuff so you'd need to do some in-depth reading on it to get a decent understanding of the various arguments made, but his biggest fuck up (irving's) was trying to sue HER over something which was ostensibly "true" (that he was a "denier")

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st The daily shoah, on trs

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st nah i'm not really into that stuff

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st fine fine, they did some really good holohoax content recently going over the legitimate revisionist arguments (not just >wooden doors lol xd) and pointing out bullshit pro-side arguments etc.

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st i'm just not into videos

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st ah, it's a podcast primarily, they have video for payfags EXCEPT for a few vids on bitchute so you could jus listen but whatevs~~~

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st yeah i'm more into reading, thanks tho

@ItsNotKoshuh@poa.st @Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st no surprise i guess, when half of hollywood backed his opponent, that they'd throw some change into making video propaganda

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st then you'd wanna just read stuff like the holocaust handbooks for the revisionist side, also gemar rudolf's work such as 'The chemistry of Auschwitz" which gives a firm argument as to the zyclon B argument being bunk (affirming the Leuchter report findings etc.) (as well as the pro-side if you wanna compare and contrast, there's a couple of incorrigible viewpoints which you eventuate to such as how cyanide works, particularly it's lethality and other properties, a well as the "where did the jews go then? question etc.)

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @ItsNotKoshuh@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st I forget how much they gave for lipstadt's lawyer, something like 250k plus if I recall lol

@Arty24@poa.st @Samhydeigger@poa.st bro don't take this the wrong way but I don't necessarily want to get any deeper into it. the greatest victory is success, what are YOU doing TODAY to find it?

@fluffy@social.handholding.io @Samhydeigger@poa.st no worries! it's just a topic I enjoy going on an on about aaaa