>split archive>the maximum length is still too large to fit in a fat32 filesystemWhat's the point.

@mikuphile@gearlandia.haus use exfat

@mikuphile@gearlandia.haus why use a file system straight outta 1990

[email protected] will never fall for the exfat meme again. I always make sure to properly unmount filesystems before removing a drive, but I've had exfat filesystems become corrupted despite that.It looks like you can just combine all files and split them again using primitive tools like cat and dd and it will still work (it's a 7z archive) so I just did that to make it into parts of 2GiB.

@skylar@misskey.yandere.love Because it works everywhere

@graf@poa.st @skylar@misskey.yandere.love Exfat is a meme, it's only a matter of time before it becomes corrupted even if you always unmount it before removing the drive.

you're using any FAT filesystem expecting integrity?

I am FAT and I have integrity.

@mikuphile@gearlandia.haus clearly not if it can't store files

@Koropokkur@poa.st @mac_ack@hidamari.apartments Cute floofgorl

@skylar@misskey.yandere.love @mikuphile@gearlandia.haus you know what else works everywhere in 2025? NTFS

@sapphire@shortstacksran.ch @skylar@misskey.yandere.love

@mikuphile@gearlandia.haus @skylar@misskey.yandere.love if you can’t afford the bandwidth to install ntfs-3g you shouldn’t have 4+GB files

@sapphire@shortstacksran.ch @mikuphile@gearlandia.haus @skylar@misskey.yandere.love your arguments always boil down to spending exhorbitant amounts of cash lol