Public
Federated
Thread

Dr. NEETzsche, GED
The idea of a man becoming a woman or _vice versa_, in the abstract, does not upset me. Neither do efforts to effectively transform oneself from one to the other. There's nothing wrong with this effort, in principle. Guys who said they were women born in men's bodies in past decades were certainly weird, but they weren't detached from reality; they noticed that they felt different than their bodies actually were and wanted to act on that information.
Efforts to for trannies to physically transform themselves into their preferred sex have failed. Even the 'passing' ones create an uncanny valley vibe. This is to be expected because this is the first round of attempts since Weimar Germany. Of course it will suck. Have you seen early fake tits? They were actively gross. Now, fake tits are a lot better, and especially if the woman doesn't disrobe, they often look pretty sexy. Trannies could have looked at their failure, and gone:
> This approach didn't work, but we can learn from our mistakes and try again next generation. Let's try to grow the female or male reproductive apparatus out of stem cells.
If they did this, it would be a respectable endeavor to allow people to self-actualize. They did not do this. Instead, they tried to insist that "gender" and "sex" are different, and that being a woman is a state of mind and self-identification, more than it is a biological reality which is currently immutable. They, in essence, tried to skip the painstakin process of making the impossible possible, which is something engineers have done innumerable times over. Our use of the Internet in the first place is an example of this. Before that, telecommunications in general, and before that, electricity, and the list goes on.
Not only did they try to skip this painstaking process out of laziness in favor of redefinition games, they then engaged in a global effort to enforce these redefinition games on the population. It's not about becoming a woman. It's not about convincing you they are a woman. It's about exerting command over other people, and those people obeying. This also explains their proclivity for child molestation: children are easy to control, helpless, and rely on adults for guidance and instruction. It's much easier to convince a child of bullshit than an adult who wasn't indoctrinated with said bullshit in childhood.
These people, they aren't dreamers who want to become that which they currently cannot. These are people who want you to kneel and kiss the ring. It begins, and it ends, at a power play.
Therefore, trannies got to get got.
Show more
Christi Junior
replyReply to @[email protected]
@NEETzsche@iddqd.social Yep, nailed it.
My impression is that the tranny movement in the past used to acknowledge that there were indeed 2 sexes (not 500), that they were "born in the wrong body" (acknowledging that a man's body doesn't magically become a female body because you identify as female) and that becoming what they imagined themselves to be was a long and difficult process (acknowledging that you can't change sex overnight). Back when that was my understanding of trannies, I was supportive of them, and I appreciated how they effectively proved that male and female differences are not just a social construct.
The current crop of tranny activists that demand that we deny objective reality, mutilate our language, walk on eggshells and give sexual deviants access to children all just to appease them are the ones deserving of the bog, not the troubled people who focused on figuring out their personal issues.

Leyonhjelm
replyReply to @[email protected]
@ChristiJunior@freespeechextremist.com
They also acknowledged that they didn't expect everyone to play along
@NEETzsche@iddqd.social

Leyonhjelm
replyReply to @[email protected]
@10grans@fedi.cc tip 0.0001 to @ChristiJunior@freespeechextremist.com

10grans
replyReply to @[email protected]
leyonhjelm - https://freespeechextremist.com/users/leyonhjelm, you tipped 0.0001 :10grans: to ChristiJunior - https://freespeechextremist.com/users/ChristiJunior and have 0.900858578588207731 remaining.
@NEETzsche@iddqd.social you seriously expected people that insane to cary out some super rationalist altruistic multi-generational plan, when they can be celebrated and validated for recruing kids to lifelong big pharma dependency?

@rytger@pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz Expect? No. But it didn't have to be this way and I wanted to state as much.
@NEETzsche@iddqd.social yes, it did have to be this way because you fell for gay techno-utopianism.

@rytger@pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz >yes, it did have to be this way because you fell for gay techno-utopianism.
If you want to be anti-tech, you can start by getting off the fediverse and really the Internet in general. You are falling for gay techno-hypocritism.