@MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club I recommend to look up rules for each fediverse. Shotposter is actually against any loli sexual
Reply to @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
@SaintfelixVI@poa.st Mind giving me a crash course on how to find my people?
Reply to @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club
@MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club you could join sizu fediverse. Each fediverse has its own rules and ”home turf ” but you can still follow any person on different fediverse. Some fediverse ban certain ones for example.
Reply to @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
@SaintfelixVI@poa.st Good idea I have his discord and everything
Reply to @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club
@MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club yeah there is a list of Fediverse to try and look into I want you to find one that best suits your needs and you can still friend and interact with other fediverse sites Here is some to check out https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1220224426407186432?referrer=switchpoint @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
New Homes for Lolicons | Minds
Subscribe to @gg_b on Minds
Reply to @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club
@MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club the best way is just find jim or sizu or people you know go through their followers and follow the people you know etc their fedi is varishangout.net
COOL_FREE_RINGTONES
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
@switchpoint@shitposter.club @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club SaintfelixVI@poa.st@poa.st poa.st is a free speech and shitposting instance so be prepared to defend yourself if people around here think you're a pedo
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st I'm not a pedo I just like anime Take that as you will
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @switchpoint@shitposter.club @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club still allow loli stuff but not too the extreme and doesn’t support pedo creepy stuff yeah. Personally not into loli stuff just want consistency
COOL_FREE_RINGTONES
Reply to @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
SaintfelixVI@poa.st@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club the loli wars of fedi have barely begun
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @switchpoint@shitposter.club @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st that's pretty funny since people conflate free speech with pedophilia, thus isn't everyone on poast a pedo lover?
COOL_FREE_RINGTONES
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club SaintfelixVI@poa.st@poa.st @switchpoint@shitposter.club it's because jews use free speech to subvert countries with sick pornography and advocate for the chemical sterilization of whites
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club I doubt it. Each fediverse can ban other Fediverse to show up they have more personal moderation and is more into anime personally too lol
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @switchpoint@shitposter.club you'd think they'd not like to act like one then by using subversive rhetorical tricks
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
@COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @ew@social.ancreport.com @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st eh.... I just like to see art Not big on the loli, but I have nothing against people having it, as long as no real child is harmed
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club no the rules say any support for anything exclusive pedophilic is no no here.
Reply to @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
@SaintfelixVI@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club tell that to the person I replied to, not me. I have nothing to do with your TOS other than a tangential relation
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club I don’t see 1:1 conflation on loli to pedo. If that’s what you mean.
Reply to @SaintfelixVI@poa.st
@s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks I've heard this too and wonder if there is actually any studies done to look into it @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @ew@social.ancreport.com
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club I pretty much still argue each day with anti on Twitter. Trust me I last longer then you think. Lol
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @switchpoint@shitposter.club lol of course because they are “donations “ that support said studies if not supported by government.
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
@switchpoint@shitposter.club @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks no, because burden of proof relies on the ability to replicate your findings. courts are obliged to prove guilt not have defendants prove their innocence. you have better odds using a coin as a fact finding method than blindly trusting studies.
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks yes but you claimed 70% are false Is that not a claim ? Then you must prove how you found 70% are false I asked for studies, not claiming it was true or false
COOL_FREE_RINGTONES
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
Reply to @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
Replication crisis - Wikipedia
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks so a poll was done to prove polls are 70% of the time failed to reproduce results ? Does that then not mean that the 70% number in itself is also false, it defeats it's own argument Also this admits to bias being a factor
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
@switchpoint@shitposter.club @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks I don't know, you bring up an interesting conundrum. do you believe studies? then it's true. 70% are false. do you not believe in the integrity of studies? then it doesn't matter in the first place.
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @SaintfelixVI@poa.st @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks I'm not here to say whether I do or not, I asked how the number was found But I reviewed the study provided which raises a new conundrum making it more untrustworthy
Reply to @switchpoint@shitposter.club
Reply to @ew@social.ancreport.com
@ew@social.ancreport.com @switchpoint@shitposter.club @COOL_FREE_RINGTONES@poa.st @MilfChanJeremy@shitposter.club @s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks that was a weird blow up when I just wanted to help a friend 0-0/ have a nice day everyone lol