Does that law saying that the FBI has to approve depictions of them apply to books/published fiction?
Reply to @[email protected]
Because in Gehenna’s Gutter I’m planning on portraying them in a very negative light, cowardly, beholden to vile Yehudi elites, essentially tiny dicked bugmen hiding behind their authority and the guns of ZOG to crush the little people
hydramacready
Reply to @[email protected]
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st sounds like a question for Augustus Invictus
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st You could be the First Amendment case that turns it around!
Reply to @[email protected]
@job384@poa.st Hypothetical FBI bugman: “That character that pisses himself after being tortured and outed as a CSAM consumer before getting his knob cut off with a cigar cutter? He’s based on me!”
Reply to @[email protected]
@hydramacready@poa.st Is he on poa.st?
Reply to @[email protected]
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st From https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/709 knowingly uses the words “Federal Bureau of Investigation” or the initials “F.B.I.”, or any colorable imitation of such words or initials, in connection with any advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet or other publication, play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, in a manner reasonably calculated to convey the impression that such advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet or other publication, play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, is approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; I suppose you could include at the beginning and end some note about how this thing is specifically not "approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation;"
18 U.S. Code § 709 - False advertising or misuse of names to indicate Federal agency
Reply to @[email protected]
@Cyclopes@poa.st I’m definitely gonna put disclaimers saying that the Pig American Zionist Empire and their FBI coons have not endorsed this badass book...because they’re gay!
Reply to @[email protected]
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st alternatively they run at someone with section 701 which is a little more broad.(https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/701)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/701)
Reply to @[email protected]
@Cyclopes@poa.st That sounds like it’s for counterfeiting badges/credentials
Reply to @[email protected]
@RoyalJohnny242@poa.st While that is true, I would expect the courts to accept the glow-nigs view on it, which means as broad as it could possibly be read. After all they seem to be as controlled by blackmail as the political class.