Oklahoma City Bombing 30th Anniversary – Why Did the Gov’t Blow Up a Day Care Center? – OffGuardianhttps://off-guardian.org/2025/05/20/oklahoma-city-bombing-30th-anniversary-why-did-the-govt-blow-up-a-day-care-center/ - https://off-guardian.org/2025/05/20/oklahoma-city-bombing-30th-anniversary-why-did-the-govt-blow-up-a-day-care-center/> Last month was the 30th anniversary of the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995, where, according to the “government” and monopoly media, a federal building in Oklahoma City was bombed by a white supremac…

In the image, a reinforced concrete building which resisted a full frontal blast without collapsing on itself. Fortunately build by a different contractor than the one who build the WTC7 building. Doesn't matter how many times you explain to normies that a building doesn't enter free fall unless A) is made of literal garbage or really bad engineering, B) Is brought down by controlled demolition.

PalePimp - https://poa.st/users/PalePimp Until you can get them to break through this barrier, they cannot hear it:We believe the first thing read or heard about a topic, especially when repeated. Later, even when faced with incontrovertible proof, facts that cannot be disputed, proving accepted beliefs false, we are surprisingly reluctant to change our minds, and we will “hesitate and waver and continue to believe there must be some other explanation”. Our minds are apparently unable to accept that we have believed lies.

PalePimp - https://poa.st/users/PalePimp The best place to start with someone believing the Arab in a cave conspiracy theory about 911 is WTC7 and this analysis: https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 - https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7Ask him to show you any situation where a high rise steel framed building collapsed from a fire. Once they realize that is impossible, they will be open to understanding that aluminum planes could not structurally impair WTC1 & 2, and jet fuel cannot melt steel.

So what hit the towers?

transgrammaractivist - https://mugicha.club/users/transgrammaractivistThe more you understand the structural engineering, the more you realize how irrelevant is that question. Whether they were planes or explosive missiles, the buildings could not collapse like they did, but this takes longer for people to understand.WTC7 is the weakest part of the narrative. It was not hit by anything yet collapsed into its footprint. PalePimp - https://poa.st/users/PalePimp

You didnt answer the question lol. What hit the towers?

What killed the Dinosaurs you doofus? They are fucking dead, they died a long time ago. The buildings fell on free fall, and that only happens if they are choose one: A) BUILD LIKE SHIT B) DEMOLISHED Choose your option wisely kike.

They did not fall on free fall lmao. Theres multiple videos showing that not to be the case theyre even linked. How does questioning the retarded 9/11 truther shit make me a jew? Also cna yu explain your theory please on how this works?

Get out out here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WNk674LZrI

>poasting the video from the angle where you dont see the roof cave in first before the rest comes down Is the roof caving in freefall?

I can make it easy: 1. The Jews purposely didn’t go to work in those buildings because they got the call 2. Mossad planted explosives and blew them all up

Ok so why hit them with planes?

kayfabe

Seems alot easier to just have urban moving systems move around saudis to hit them with a plane.

the plane crashes were a distraction and an easy excuse to use when they blew them up, kikes own the media so they just covered up the fact that jet fuel doesn’t melt steel and also those buildings were SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED to withstand jet strikes full of fuel

You dont have to melt the steel goober it loses like 50% of its strength when you get it hot enough. Also why not just bomb it at that point? Theyd done it before why make this elaborate plane hijacking plus explosive combo? And then why hit the pentagon with a plane? Another distraction from bombs lol?

Trauma-induced mind control. CIA figured out that with enough trauma or traumatic imagery you can control a person's or people's behaviors, even if only a little. MKUltra on a national scale.

Well sure but how does that disprove a plane hitting the pentagon. If anything it reinforce the idea of them actually doing it.

No plane hit the pentagon, just a missile. Cus all we've seen is 2 or 3 frames of a security video and we are just supposed to believe that a plane managed to hit one of America's most guarded airspaces like it was nothing. The blast radius of the hit was too small for a commercial passenger airplane, plus there was no damage from the plane's wings into the building or plane wreckage found at the pentagon (or at that farmer's field). 9/11 was multiple objectives in one day: >9/10 - Rumsfeld states that there is $2.3 trillion unaccounted for in the Treasury/Pentagon (I can't recall which right now) >WTC1 & WTC2 are the jingly keys to distract, traumatize and Americans against America's (Isreal's) middle eastern enemies >the section of the Pentagon that was hit was the financial analyists offices >WTC7 was the financial paper archives of the Pentagon/Treasury It was to cover for massive financial crimes (theft) and to get Americans riled up enough to go into a forever war to fight Israel's enemies ("We're going to take out 7 countries in 5 years.")

What kind of missle and fired from what? It also not true that no wreckage was recovered and a missle would leave wreckage

Prob some cruise missile. I'm not sure from where or what though. As I've said, we only ever saw 3 frames of video.

You must have some idea of the kind of missle used if you actually believe this

The US is also at like 38 trillion in debt why haven't we seen multiple pentagon bombings to cover for that and why would they announce said shortfall the day before it was hit if this is all planned. Why not just say nothing and allow the documents to be destroyed? They couldn't wait one more day?

Well for one, most of America wasn't paying attention and the internet wasn't as expansive as it is now. Secondly, Rumsfeld is a goy and more likely to be honest about noticing financial crimes being committed. Third, most of that $38 trillion came AFTER 2003 due to the "war on terror" that proceeded the next 20-ish years and the current conflicts American money has been spent on. This new debt wasn't kept secret from the public, what with the debt trackers on major news outlets. Four, 9/11 is a memetic number already associated with a call for safety (9-1-1). Just another jab at the American psyche.

So rumsfeld who would have to be in on this was honest about financial crimes but then engaged in a plot to cover them up. Square that circle for me. Also if no one was paying attention or knew why come out the day before and admit it?

There are press releases for what Secretaries and other cabinet members say to the public and press. Most of America didn't notice cus the average person was more interested in whatever sitcoms or sportsball games were on TV. You put too much stock in the average person's intelligence and attention span.

>You put too much stock in the average person's intelligence and attention span. I don't put any stock in them. still_too_much.gif

I just want an explaination of how runsfeld as a goy would be more honest and disclose this fraud and then turn around and the military do a missle strike to cover it up the next day? Also what kind of missle was it.

You're assuming Rumsfeld was involved. I made no such claims he was, just that he made the claim that $2.3 trillion was missing. And as I said before, I don't know what kind of missile would have been fired. I don't know the make, model and explosive yield of every kind of missile made before 2001.

If the US military did a strike on US territory the fucking secdef would be involved.

You're assuming he'd be involved at all and not some rogue party(s) operating on the orders of another group (Israelis/jews).

So youre saying the isrealis snuck a missle into the US or stole one from the US military but that its impossible that saudis hijacked the plane?