Public
Federated
Thread

Your New Sigma Furry Futa Waifu :verified:
linked_list_fan-vs-array_enjoyer.mp4 - https://neckbeard.xyz/media/a5c53bb394c971ab56eac16876e02e9c1105134dcaf6582c0822c6efde1e6fb3.mp4?name=linked_list_fan-vs-array_enjoyer.mp4



Your New Sigma Furry Futa Waifu :verified:
replyReply to @[email protected]
@sss@pleroma.dark-alexandr.net arrays scale fine

replyReply to @[email protected]
@sjw@neckbeard.xyz no, not really, so if you do not know maximum count of elements, using arrays is a high risk, but of course it also depends on how you will use this array.

Crypto Booster
replyReply to @[email protected]
sjw - https://neckbeard.xyz/users/sjw Imagine throwing away constant time indexing and good cache performance just so you can do a couple of middle insertions

Your New Sigma Furry Futa Waifu :verified:
replyReply to @[email protected]
@sss@pleroma.dark-alexandr.net My 128 cores and 5 TB of RAM says arrays scale fine.

Your New Sigma Furry Futa Waifu :verified:
replyReply to @[email protected]
@sumikasumi@paypig.org Imagine having smol cache

replyReply to @[email protected]
@sjw@neckbeard.xyz no, not really ) a lot depends of algorithm used, different containers perform well for different algorithms, indeed it does exists algorithms designed for plain arrays, but also exists a lot of algos which does not work with plain arrays at all


Your New Sigma Furry Futa Waifu :verified:
replyReply to @[email protected]
@sss@pleroma.dark-alexandr.net Everything works well when you have 4 GB of L3 cache.