Sick Burn, Bro
Here's what the SCOTUS struck down, btw.
🏖️ SummerSnekFriend #BrideMonth #WBS 🏖️
Reply to @[email protected]
[email protected]@poa.st >Unanimously That is the surprising thing.
Sick Burn, Bro
Reply to @[email protected]
indeed, good catch.
Sick Burn, Bro
Reply to @[email protected]
what it means is that the liberals are terrified of the whole civil rights apple cart being upset and are giving tons of ground.
D-Droid the Eepy
Reply to @[email protected]
So libs are trying to pacify Whites now that Whites understand civil rights was fake and gay and done just to hurt Whites?
🏖️ SummerSnekFriend #BrideMonth #WBS 🏖️
Reply to @[email protected]
D-Droid sickburnbro I don't think the liberal side and Roberts believes Whites pushing nationalism can be "pacified". It's more like they are culling the logical extremes of the Civil Rights laws to ensure the foundational substance remains as long as the regime can make it possible. "Sure, we will treat all equally, including straight White men, but you still cannot have freedom of association." It's that part the liberals are interested in, not pacifity.
Reply to @[email protected]
They are doing the same thing with the NFA laws.
Winged Hussar
Reply to @[email protected]
I don't see how "actually we were systemically discriminating against you" is a good pacifiction argument
🏖️ SummerSnekFriend #BrideMonth #WBS 🏖️
Reply to @[email protected]
[email protected]@poa.st @D-Droid@poa.st @sickburnbro@poa.st I thought that was a Congress thing that is attempting to remove stamps and restrictions for suppressors and such. Is there an SCotUS case right now about the NFA?
It is Congress, the Court actually turned down two major AWB/mag capacity cases in the last few days. I suspect the unanimity is because the plain language of the Civil Rights Act does prohibit reverse discrimination, and the liberals would have to go out on a very long limb to defend it (original intent notwithstanding). I would suspect conservative justices granted the petition and the liberals went along because any dissent would just blatantly support reverse discrimination and that would be worse than if they had denied the case writ in the first place, which they would have.
Reply to @[email protected]
There is usually a merry-go-round of such cases trying to reach the Supreme Court in any given year, the Court usually ignores/returns such cases.
D-Droid the Eepy
Reply to @[email protected]
That assumption seems correct